avatar
PinkTweets @pinktweets.bsky.social

Sorry but there is a legal reason for that limitation. And it isn't network channels, it is *broadcast* network stations.

aug 30, 2025, 3:49 pm • 3 0

Replies

avatar
Skunk @skunkityskunk.bsky.social

Ok rather then just knocking down all of their ideas, offer a solution.

aug 30, 2025, 4:38 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
PinkTweets @pinktweets.bsky.social

Those reasons include a Constitutional limit on the exercise of Congressional authority.

aug 30, 2025, 4:55 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
PinkTweets @pinktweets.bsky.social

I'm not knocking down ideas. I am providing factual information. I can't offer a solution to "violate the First Amendment."

aug 30, 2025, 4:40 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Lizard @lizardky.bsky.social

Q: "What is the solution to people consuming media I don't approve of?" A: "Totalitarianism." Trump is all-in on that solution. How is it working out for you? Happy so far?

aug 30, 2025, 4:57 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Bespoke Federal Reserve Exception @moreyamsterdam.bsky.social

There is a magical way to ban all speech I dislike while protecting speech I like. This way can and will never be abused.

aug 30, 2025, 5:00 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Two all the way, a coffee milk, and a Del's @ri.oldfolkshome.org

I don't believe in the "do something" fallacy[*]. And neither should you. If someone has bad ideas they damn well shoud be knocked down. Vigorously. With no need or obligation to "offer a solution". ([*] "Something needs to be done!" "This is something." "Do it!")

aug 30, 2025, 5:09 pm • 0 0 • view