In the legal sense, no, there is not. They are using the popular sense of the word. Zarnowski, if he really ever worked for the CIA, would have had to comply with the Whistleblower Protection Act if he wanted legal protection for revealing classified info.
I get your point. It was written that nothing he revealed was classified only hidden.
Which I believe to be bullshit, just like I think his claim of having worked for the CIA is bullshit and his claim about there having been an audit pertaining to the voting machines is bullshit. If it isn't classified, he can release it.
Yes, I think that's true. Why isn't the 2nd whistleblower being scrutinized?
It isn't clear from that second post that there is a second whistleblower. The headline says there is but when you read it they say nothing about a second whistleblower. It is just more info and then they start talking about "team members." I guess we are supposed to assume that the info they
talk about came from this second whistleblower. Who the hell knows? I think I know who at least one person behind this substack is and there is no reason whatsoever to think that she would have access to the kind of info she claims to have.
Good to know. Given that both felon & helno publicly admitted wrongdoing (they may have been too stoned to realize it) discounting possibility of nefarious, stealth backdoor editing seems foolish. Felon actually said helno changed PA votes.
Another time he said Elon was great with computers & a few clicks on the keyboard & he won PA, but couldn't find that clip. Here's the clip: youtu.be/F9gCyRkpPe8
I remember it. I just don't know if he was trolling or if he wasn't, was there any proof of it.
bsky.app/profile/r5-t...