Why not make good/evil/neutral refer to judgement of the wavefunction? So, move QBism down to Chaotic Evil, put objective collapse at Chaotic Good, and consistent histories at Chaotic Neutral. And swap Bohm w/ Everett. Neutral good's stance is the QM math needs no interpretation ("idk, seems fine").
* judgement -> reality
Ah yes, "needs no interpretation" would have been good to include (though I guess some would call that "Copenhagen"). What does "neutral" mean with respect to the ontic/epistemic distinction? In any event, my aim was more lighthearted trolling than earnest classification!