Seeing a lot of takes from lawyers that SCOTUS won't overturn Obergefell (same-sex marriage) in the Kim Davis case, and like... no offense, but I feel like we heard the same thing with Roe being overturned.
Seeing a lot of takes from lawyers that SCOTUS won't overturn Obergefell (same-sex marriage) in the Kim Davis case, and like... no offense, but I feel like we heard the same thing with Roe being overturned.
Like I get the lawyerly reasoning behind it all. Solid analysis. But we don't live in that world anymore.
I'm so stunned by how completely unprepared lawyers have been these past 16 years. Have lawyers met each other? Why is anyone assuming good intent here?
idk I don't understand it either. Lawyers seem to think The Law is a magical institution that is much more resilient than reality. I think they're also very ivory towered.
when much of our non-codified practices/procedures rest on "gentleman's agreement", this is where we end up. A lesson we learn over and over in history is that polite agreements between the ruling class are always weaker than one sociopath with money.
Seems that this SCOTUS could find documents proving that actually in the 1700s a ham sandwich was considered a weapon of mass destruction.