construction and design create jobs, then operations require jobs, business profits are taxed, then you have hypothetical benefits of better connectivity. All this is taxed and could be spent on your favourite idea - Iβd like better hospice care.
construction and design create jobs, then operations require jobs, business profits are taxed, then you have hypothetical benefits of better connectivity. All this is taxed and could be spent on your favourite idea - Iβd like better hospice care.
Ah bless, you think international corporations pay tax in the UK.
Corporation tax is one of the largest tax income streams. You should care about this.
Why are you taken in by the lie that GDP growth benefits ordinary people? When governments only use the public purse to commit acts of vandalism like Heathrow and HS2?
I do not understand how your against Heathrow and HS2 both on environmental grounds. Do you know HS2 is mostly about carrying freight ? Which means less vehicles on the road ?
Do you think flora and fauna are cartoon characters?
I donβt think you know what youβre talking about. Would you like Β£10,000 per year more? The French, Germans, and Americans are richer than us. The French use their money to have better worker protections and more free time. Investments into infrastructure is how we become wealthier.
What, you think that after decades of decline, and leaving the worlds most successful trading bloc, building an environmentally catastrophic runway will suddenly put Β£10k pa in all our pockets? Give your head a wobble son
Then they should raise the rate and leave their grubby hands off Heathrow which has suffered enough
You can construct things that don't fuck up the environment and ruin the lives of thousands of Londoners. It's 2025, long-haul flights are a blight not a benefit.
every person in the country objects to things being built near them. Itβs big part of the reason the French and Germans are Β£10,000 quid better off than us. We have to make money.
How will a third runway make money for the treasury? Like everything else in rip-off Britain it will be for the benefit of off-shore private capital.
Every business with employees makes money for the treasury.
Humans are just drones to work to finance the government then? While the world burns and the earth dies? What good will money be when the biosphere collapses?
And how does that help the poor or even the squeezed middle?
Poor people need good jobs.
Yes, and expanding Heathrow will produce mainly minimum wage jobs at huge cost to the environment