Why would comms folks within the DNC write a contract that gives them broad discretion to kill certain content? Maybe that would be over Gaza, maybe it'd be over some other policy. But that leads me back to my point: What ELSE would it be lol?? This is the one issue we're fighting over lol
Bud, Gaza wasn’t even a top 10 issue with voters in exit polls last fall. Why would the DNC concoct such an elaborate ruse on an issue that doesn’t even motivate American voters?
It’s amazing how many leftists have made Gaza their personality, but only so far as it can be used against their political enemies. Kind of like how you clowns were real concerned about Tara Reade, until she was no longer useful. It shouldnt be surprising, yet here we are.
Because every PR firm has that clause in their contracts? See, you're weaving conspiracy theories again! You claimed you shifted your priors, but you didn't, you're right back to the same unfounded claim!
This is not PR??? The fuck lol
It quite literally is lmao
David Pakman ain't doing PR for the Dems, or at least that's not what he claims to be doing. That is a wild claim to make. But we're just gonna disagree on that I guess.
Paying advocates is literally a form of PR lmao "Wild claim" bud scroll up, you've made a few yourself!
That's so insane of you to be saying big accounts like Pakman are supposed to do PR work lol, like do you think they want to be seen as that?
Bud, paid political activism is PR, I dunno what to tell you!
Every copywriting or marketing gig I ever did had a clause like that. It’s pretty boilerplate. If an ad firm makes a commercial for a client, and the client doesn’t like it, the client has discretion to keep it off the air.