You know I'm just gonna say it's concerning to me all the guys I'm fighting on here tonight who purport to be good Democrats are doing so much work to be exclusionary and to gatekeep. Kind of gets back to my original point.
You know I'm just gonna say it's concerning to me all the guys I'm fighting on here tonight who purport to be good Democrats are doing so much work to be exclusionary and to gatekeep. Kind of gets back to my original point.
Because I think Lorenz sees conspiracies everywhere? That her shit talking affects her work? Because I think she's a shit journalist? That's exclusionary? OK.
You told me I'm not a Democrat because we disagree lol
And yet, that was not where you choose to write that response, you did so after I pointed out that what Lorenz wrote is not the scandalous affair she seems to think it is.
And of course, what I actually said was that you weren't a Democrat because you seemed to really dislike them.
How is that different than what I said?
I'm saying you're drawing lines in the sand over these issues and I think that's a problem within our party, especially when *electeds* do it!
No, I'm drawing lines in the sand around actually disliking the thing involved. If you don't like the Democrats, you don't have to be one.
Lmao prove my point more big dawg
You don't have a point.
You've said in this thread that only legislators do policy work, which is false, and you're claiming things about what I think. Again, it's weird for an elected to do that to someone with ostensibly less power than you. I highly doubt you'd speak to a constituent who disagreed with you like this.
Dislike and dissent are different things. I believe I explained this to you already.
You're an elected and you're trying to telling me what I think. I think that says a lot!
No, I'm explaining the difference between the words to you.
❤️