That's just not right. She shouldn't have to go without the medication she needs. A few years ago I was taking a couple of different medications together. Then the government said I couldn't take both. Needless to say losing one didn't help my pain situation.
I wish some of these doctors and government officials had to live how I live for a few days. They would change their tune quickly. It has been mostly men making decisions about my damn healthcare.
It's non-doctors and non-pharmacists insurance employees whose JOB is to DENY CARE who make our decisions. I hope every insurance CEO lives in constant fear, because that's how they make us live.
I understand restrictions because it's a controlled substance, but with every other med you get to have a few days buffer. With this one a few days deficit every six months. Can't get it without insurance approval, can't pay cash in the meantime without losing coverage altogether.
Possibly look into and work with her Dr for an early refill due to "travel." Even if it's just 1-2 weeks' worth, it will give a bit of a buffer for her to not go without. I refill my RXs ASAP whether or not I need it so I can build up a small back supply, but I know that doesn't work for everyone.
Not possible with federally controlled medications. Like I said, she gets a 28-day supply on day 29. Absolutely no sooner than she needs it. They're afraid she's going to sell them on the street even though the pain makes her suicidal without it.
This has happened to me too. I can understand some of their concerns about selling drugs or suicide. But if the person has been taking a medication for a long time that should get you some leeway. Plus, you're talking about one pill. I know it's frustrating.
It's the fact that she's been taking it for so long that makes them question whether she needs it. It's a medication they have on their short time list not their chronic list. So every 6 months the doctor has to justify it even though she's on a pain management plan.