Pretty sure those 180,000 folks who feed their families would disagree. Also the profit motive limits waste and corruption. Without a profit motive you get a lot of waste and corruption (see government)
Pretty sure those 180,000 folks who feed their families would disagree. Also the profit motive limits waste and corruption. Without a profit motive you get a lot of waste and corruption (see government)
So let us get this straight—180,000 folks would object to raising that number to 200,000? Twenty thousand new jobs, in a fairer, more stable economy? That’s not disagreement—that’s a misread. Take a moment. Revisit the reply.