He's more than willing to talk about multiple other topics, but not this one, even as hes gotten more and more criticism and other members of the party HAVE talked about it and espoused an antitrans rhetoric. That's the actual point that I said in the first response

Shouldn't your ire then be directed at those who have espoused an anti trans rhetoric rather than one of the 800,000 members who haven't?

You are once again missing the point. If one member has no problem saying anti-trans things, why can't another member stand up for trans people? Coalitions with bigots are doomed, dead on arrival. This has already been proven numerous times.

There is no evidence this one member is a bigot. His whole history suggests the opposite. Any coalition would be with the 800,000 members not just one.

I'm not saying Jeremy Corbyn is a bigot, I'm saying this other member is: bsky.app/profile/vale... Why isn't Jeremy speaking out about this, even though he clearly could and should do so?

Perhaps because it's not his party, and he has, as yet, no rank to pull? What have the other 800,000 members said about this member?

Trans is a divisive issue on the left, they'd be mad to commit themselves one way or another - the idea is to have as broad a socialist movement as possible, not one that will shatter into a hundred factions before it even has a manifesto.

"divisive issue" eat my shit, we are human beings and deserve basic dignity, I don't care if you find it divisive. Humans rights seems very "divisive" from the point of view of a bigoted shitcan