Like my college professors on both the undergrad and graduate level, I am not going to take wikipedia as a source. Its no more reliable than asking Chat GPT
Replies
Hi J H. What source would you recommend to support your view?
sep 8, 2025, 3:10 pm • 0 0 • view
That...is not true lol. Wikipedia has been on the level of Encylopedia Britannica for a while now. Plus Wiki has the exact sources for everything quoted at the end. If you dont want to cite wiki itself, just go to those sources. CGPT just pretends to give you sources.
sep 8, 2025, 2:00 pm • 4 0 • view
techxplore.com/news/2022-04...
sep 8, 2025, 12:45 am • 6 0 • view
At this point, I have to ask... are you just trolling? Because Wikipedia (where you can look up sources fairly quickly) is much more reliable than ChatGPT which is known to the judicial system to make things up entirely, and provide sources that don't exist in this universe.
sep 8, 2025, 4:40 am • 15 0 • view
Wikipedia article writers cite their sources. You, so far, have not.
sep 8, 2025, 1:29 am • 21 0 • view
Haha, you can just click on the sources dude, it’s not hard.
sep 8, 2025, 1:59 am • 8 0 • view
You can scroll down and read all 262 references if you feel the need to double check the article.
sep 8, 2025, 12:29 am • 50 0 • view
There's also quite a few peer reviewed journal articles on the replication crisis, you can find some of them in the references section of the wikipedia article.
sep 8, 2025, 12:53 am • 15 0 • view
You were dumb enough to cite Wikipedia in your grad classes huh?
sep 8, 2025, 5:32 pm • 0 0 • view