To everyone trying to argue with me in this thread, you're not making any sense. allow me to refer you to this crucial point
Replies
"it lies only about twice that of humans." Nothing in this argument makes sense. It's AI slop defending AI slop. Incoherent.
aug 6, 2025, 4:50 pm • 127 7 • view
This one came out today www.theguardian.com/world/2025/a... And there are numerous examples of AI companies actively collaborating with the Israeli government in the genocide and ICE in domestic repression. Just about every head of every major AI company has bent the knee to trump.
aug 7, 2025, 12:30 am • 86 19 • view
See, all of this. Racism is embedded in the DNA of it because racists are programming it.
aug 7, 2025, 1:17 am • 87 16 • view
Finally genAI is right about something
aug 8, 2025, 1:38 am • 46 5 • view
💀💀💀💀
aug 8, 2025, 1:48 am • 62 8 • view
doc of resources on genAI's destructiveness and uselessness for all those naysayers in your life and in these comments
aug 8, 2025, 2:44 pm • 34 5 • view
Source: open.substack.com/pub/xriskolo...
aug 9, 2025, 9:18 pm • 18 0 • view
{content warning: suicide} GenAI is encouraging teens to kill themselves. open.substack.com/pub/bloodint...
aug 29, 2025, 12:35 am • 42 16 • view
They almost got you there, huh.
aug 28, 2025, 5:23 pm • 1 0 • view
🎶 I found my thrill On Bluebberry Hill🎶 — Fats GPTomino
aug 9, 2025, 9:30 pm • 2 0 • view
Beer almost came outta my nose, wtactualfuck 😂😂😂
aug 8, 2025, 1:53 am • 1 0 • view
This is fine. The fact that the US stock market is propped up on the backs of 6 companies 1 of whom, NVIDIA, is propped up by the other 5 burning billions on AI is fine. No bubble. No climate crisis. No problem. (No product. no profit. no nothing except bad bad bad shit)
aug 8, 2025, 1:51 am • 5 0 • view
Aw come on, the way Dafoe whipped his light saber against Harvey Keitel was wicked pissa
aug 8, 2025, 1:56 am • 0 0 • view
😂😂😂
aug 8, 2025, 1:52 am • 3 0 • view
ty for the clarification! will read that article in a little bit
aug 7, 2025, 12:55 am • 2 0 • view
Thanks for the question!
aug 7, 2025, 12:57 am • 2 0 • view
notice how often genocide supporters, ai sloppers, and other bald heads can't argue the merits of their things as they exist in reality? "the thing *could* be awesome if these 68 necessary hypothetical conditions happen first!"
aug 6, 2025, 5:00 pm • 8 1 • view
i'd also add that i don't ask other humans to write things for me, so it's not a particularly strong argument anyway
aug 7, 2025, 1:46 am • 2 0 • view
Wrong. Hallucination amongst large-language-models is running approximately _thirty percent_ across the board, and is: -- getting worse with time ( 'model collapse' ) -- can not be removed ( it is in the architecture )
aug 7, 2025, 4:24 am • 0 0 • view
~ 30 percent means it "lies" ( if it even knew what that meant!!! ) at more than _four times_ the rate of the population of humans, in general. Progress!!!
aug 7, 2025, 4:25 am • 0 0 • view
My gooosh what an absolutely awful argument they're trying to use
aug 6, 2025, 5:07 pm • 3 0 • view
They don't have even _one_ good argument! It's all just false analogies and "well it's happening so suck it up Luddite lulz".
aug 7, 2025, 2:00 am • 3 0 • view
“It only lies (slightly more than) twice as often as humans” do you’re saying that humans are twice as reliable as the best “AI”, and using that as an argument… FOR the slop robot??? 🤨 (Not you Daniel, the other guy you’re responding to)
aug 6, 2025, 6:40 pm • 4 0 • view
Got into it with this person and it ended with "at least AI doesn't murder, cause war, etc." Like what are we even doing
aug 7, 2025, 12:32 am • 4 0 • view
Lmao please
aug 7, 2025, 12:35 am • 3 0 • view
Even that’s not true Insurance companies using it to deny medical coverage are absolutely using it to murder people
aug 7, 2025, 3:27 am • 6 0 • view
I expect humans to lie. I dont expect human paralegals to make up fake cout cases to cite as precedent when writing legal briefs. I dont expect humans writing research papers to cite fake non-existent studies as sources. Thats the difference.
aug 6, 2025, 7:51 pm • 10 0 • view
And if a human does do those things, they get fired.
aug 6, 2025, 10:56 pm • 3 0 • view
so it's twice as unreliable as any other average online search which is in fact the baseline. an incredible endorsement from them really
aug 6, 2025, 4:52 pm • 36 0 • view
The problem isnt you looking up something in a search engine. Its lawyers submitting legal briefs AI spat out that cite non-existent cases as precedent.
aug 6, 2025, 7:53 pm • 5 0 • view
Or the head of the CDC releasing & making decisions based om AI generated reports that cite fake non-existent studies.
aug 6, 2025, 7:54 pm • 7 0 • view