I'd say it's a deliberately misleading take on possibly solid science. There is nothing wrong with women having "stronger emotional responses". Unless you think that women need to be subservient.

Their troglodytes that think “emotional women are weak.” Nevermind all the emotional men acting like lunatics. But then again, violence is strength and honor. Compassion, caring for the weak, protecting the vulnerable all are considered feminine. This bad. Very fascist all around.

Reminded of being called "very feminine in your conflict address", which I believe (blocked the idiot so can't check) was to do with thinking genocide is a bad thing.

50 odd years ago, after graduating from college,I was told in an interview that the firm didn’t hire women because they were too emotional. I was thunderstruck because the most unbalanced emotional people I met in college were all men.

Not even. The article they cropped frames the observations in a positive light. But they didnt read the article, they just saw the word "emotional" and went to work lying.