2. “.. investors have been reacting to a fugazi. For one, these ‘deals’ we are seeing, no matter how ‘big’ they are, have not been legislated anywhere. They are not law. They are nothing more than frameworks.”
Replies
D'uh. Why anyone believes this idiot is beyond me.
jul 29, 2025, 11:36 am • 7 2 • view
He's right on the facts and law. But it's wishful thinking to believe the Supreme Court will go along with shutting down Trump's tariff program.
jul 29, 2025, 11:55 am • 11 0 • view
But until they do, his tariffs are illegal
jul 29, 2025, 11:59 am • 8 0 • view
Illegal is a state of mind if there's nobody to enforce the law.
jul 29, 2025, 12:01 pm • 20 3 • view
Truly the quote of our times.
jul 29, 2025, 12:07 pm • 7 0 • view
TY! 👍
jul 29, 2025, 1:30 pm • 0 0 • view
My cup is always half full
jul 29, 2025, 12:14 pm • 0 0 • view
Concepts of a deal.
jul 29, 2025, 10:46 pm • 3 0 • view
So are they actually collecting tariffs? If so, under what authority? If not, shouldn’t the media report this?
jul 29, 2025, 11:42 am • 0 1 • view
The tariffs are being collected (according to treasury statements and corroborated by reports from importers).
jul 29, 2025, 12:04 pm • 1 0 • view
Concepts of a plan?
jul 29, 2025, 12:18 pm • 4 0 • view
🎯
jul 29, 2025, 2:55 pm • 1 0 • view
Trumps presidency is a sham. Trump is a sham, a con man who belongs in prison not the WH
jul 29, 2025, 11:32 am • 76 5 • view
These F@#KEN REPUBLICANS ARE AT IT AGAIN. They are trying to make more people independent contracts in normal jobs. Why you might ask? To eliminate them added their share to Social Security. Being independent, You would be responsible for 100% tax. It's 50/50 now. www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...
jul 29, 2025, 11:37 am • 3 6 • view
I post something like this after every wannabe #kingtrump pronouncement about the "biggest deal ever". bsky.app/profile/bret...
jul 29, 2025, 11:44 am • 5 4 • view
It’s all so maddening. And unconstitutional.
jul 29, 2025, 12:34 pm • 2 0 • view
Pope Rapey Daddy had already reneged on deals a few times. They are not binding in any way.
jul 29, 2025, 2:54 pm • 0 0 • view
A: When Trump is involved.
jul 29, 2025, 1:09 pm • 0 0 • view
It’s subtle, but notice the use of the word “deal” instead of “agreement” from the top down.
jul 29, 2025, 11:43 am • 4 0 • view
I 100% believe that these tariffs are illegal and the unanimous lower court ruling (a specialized int trade court btw) that struck them down will be upheld by the Circuit ct. The only question is whether that fraud Roberts will then find a way to give Trump what he wants…AGAIN.
jul 29, 2025, 1:28 pm • 5 0 • view
He will.
jul 29, 2025, 3:09 pm • 2 0 • view
2/3s of SCOTUS have already made one ruling with no legal explanation. So, your fear is founded.
jul 29, 2025, 2:57 pm • 4 0 • view
