I don't know what the follow up question was but it should have been - "Cool, so why was this apparently deceitful and discredited person invited into your chat group?"
Replies
" I wouldn't be so unkind to describe you like that, that being said..."
mar 25, 2025, 6:27 am • 2 0 • view
No, the question should be: "Why are the senior principals of the administration using insecure devices and applications to communicate regarding US intelligence and military activities and when is the formal investigation into this beginning?" Followed by "Why hasn't it started already?"
mar 25, 2025, 7:45 am • 120 11 • view
Exactly.
mar 25, 2025, 2:13 pm • 0 0 • view
No, the question should have been: how much did you have to drink that night and how much have you been drinking since you lucked into job that you have absolutely no skills for? And after you are fired, are you going to work as a spokesman for some schnaps company?
mar 25, 2025, 8:53 am • 47 3 • view
I really don't care about his drinking except on how it affects his decision making as SecDef. He's not competent in the position, irrespective of his personal foibles. So the serious questions need to be asked, not the BS popchat issues of personalities.
mar 25, 2025, 10:45 am • 6 0 • view
This aint Ulysses S. Grant. Appointing a man with no experience and a drinking prob def has an "affect" on his "decision making". For instance, the decision to drink a lot, lot, lot and film it. That's called a bad decision. But who the fuck cares, just put him in office cause what harm can he do?
mar 25, 2025, 10:49 am • 23 2 • view
The issue is, Trump ran out of billionaires to put in all the top posts. He had to start scrapping the bottom of the narrell. HEgseth has always been bottom barrell residual. And here we are.
mar 25, 2025, 3:42 pm • 1 0 • view
Or maybe you hire absolute incompetents because you have a plan as Prez. Which has to do with punishing the country that rejected you in 2020? Of course, a person with that ego and psychotic desire for revenge would never, ever do bad things if he had the power to.
mar 25, 2025, 10:51 am • 15 4 • view
Oh I agree that it is a disqualifying factor, but there's way more that disqualified him before any of his personal attributes or addictions were public knowledge. He should never have made it to the Senate, let alone through it.
mar 25, 2025, 11:04 am • 1 0 • view
🤣🤣🤣
mar 25, 2025, 6:39 pm • 0 0 • view
During Covid, the UK government used WhatsApp to discuss strategies and procurement. Including the Prime Minister. When it came to a subsequent government inquiry he'd "accidentally" deleted all of them when he got a new phone. With no back up. I suspect the same will happen here. They laugh at us.
mar 25, 2025, 10:12 am • 1 0 • view
We had that with our PM and others chatting over Wickr. This is different, this is national security at the highest possible level on effectively open networks, devices, and apps. One of the members was IN MOSCOW at the time. But the DOJ/FBI is compromised.
mar 25, 2025, 10:43 am • 0 0 • view
It's the same as in it's a non governmental communications channel. No records, no back ups. Insecure private devices. No audit of who said what to whom. Complete disregard for the role of rules. That's the similarity I was pointing out irrespective of the consequences or the level.
mar 25, 2025, 2:19 pm • 0 0 • view
Exactly!
mar 25, 2025, 7:54 am • 0 0 • view
My point exactly
mar 25, 2025, 11:22 am • 0 0 • view
And why didn’t any of the 6 of you notice that someone who did not belong in that chat was there? If he hadn’t written the article they would never have known.
mar 25, 2025, 7:57 am • 7 0 • view
Is it visible when someone steps out the chat in Signal? Like in Whatsapp you see it clearly.
mar 25, 2025, 8:03 am • 3 0 • view
It is. The editor in chief even acknowledges this in his article but he never received any questions.
mar 25, 2025, 11:08 am • 1 0 • view
Heggie tries to imitate Trump by discrediting the journalist, but he doesn't come across as confident, only angry and aggressive. I wonder if he was sober?
mar 25, 2025, 7:50 am • 6 0 • view
Same first name? Is there a match? Then both will have to be in his phone contact list.
mar 25, 2025, 8:02 am • 1 0 • view
THANK YOU.
mar 25, 2025, 10:45 am • 0 0 • view
Of course! That must be the headquestion!
mar 25, 2025, 5:38 am • 34 0 • view
exactly!!
mar 25, 2025, 8:28 am • 0 0 • view