Yes he does what a stupid thing to say Communism is stateless and classless the mango Mussolini would have no power under communism
Yes he does what a stupid thing to say Communism is stateless and classless the mango Mussolini would have no power under communism
You mean like Xi has no power under communism?
Yes actually Xi would have no power under communism
Under the textbook definition, sure. But here in the real world there has never been a communist government where the leader did not have massive power. There is no pure communism just like there is no pure capitalism. They are ideas that get corrupted or softened in practice.
Communism is pure that's why the definition is so specific Socialism and capitalism is on a spectrum but communism is not The entire spectrum of capitalism is cruel and unsustainable The systemic incentives are obscene and are the direct cause of all of our problems
Both Capitalism and Communism have pure definitions and muddy reality. Socialism is a way point between the two. As I said, in the real world Trump would love to have the power of being supreme leader in a communist country. But perhaps if you throw some more insults you can make your point.
No capitalism's definition applies to a wide range from social democracy to fascism The definition of communism does not allow for that
Case in point is this debate. You cannot let it go, you have to "win". That is why communism always fails. Human nature.
Quick shut the conversation down it's straying outside of acceptible discourse Which part of capitalism is human nature the 99% being miserable wageslaves or the 1% being parasitic bludgercunts Communism is human nature until its programmed out of us Human nature is shaped by material conditions
You are still on this? Because people are competitive, it is an evolved trait to survive. Like you refusing to let this go and being determined to "win". You want to come out ahead of me. Think about how competitive you are, then think about how that fits into your pure communist society.
You seem to cherry pick your definitions to make your point. I get it, you are a fan of communism. Sounds nice, but only in theory. Human nature does not allow it to ever be developed in its pure form. It gets corrupted. I think we have beat this topic to death.
Again there are no communist countries And no Trump would not be leader in a communist country nor would he want to be that would put his life in danger
I will give you the win you seem to need. Trump would not have power in some ideological communist country that has never existed and never will. He WOULD however have massive power as leader of any of the countries that have tried to apply communism in the history of the world.
No he wouldn't he would not be able to get power under a socislist system and he damn sure wouldn't have got to keep it he is everything socialism is was and always will be against
You have a serious misunderstanding of what these words mean and that is intentional If you understood you would revolt No country has been communist a communist government doesn't make it a communist country The definition of communism is very specific Stateless classless moneyless society