Because it's in the context of winning elections. I fail to see how some academic vernacular that elected officials *don't use* is some how causing democrats to not get elected. It's almost as if something else is going on....
Because it's in the context of winning elections. I fail to see how some academic vernacular that elected officials *don't use* is some how causing democrats to not get elected. It's almost as if something else is going on....
I'll bet you *did* see how some rank and file GOP'ers doin' racist stuff, even if (in the past, at least) most elected GOP officials didn't, was an understandable reason for folks to think twice about voting for them. Conceptually its the same, even though one is worse than the other.
“Nutpicking” is a good term. Both sides engage in it.
Mostly fair, I think. I'm a huge French fan. I *do* think a critical mass of nuts can exist on a certain "topic" on one side or the other where its no longer unfair to point at them and be like "Are you guys gonna do somethin' about these folks, or what?" I'm an even bigger Reagan fan than French,
but, as the leader of the GOP in that era, the only complaint I'm willing to listen to about him is over his "Big Tent" approach. There were definitely folks in that tent that shoulda been exiled to outer darkness where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Everyone who knows a Republican has heard them be unapologetically racist.