And I'm legitimately trying to understand what the issue is. I do not see it. Perhaps that's my failing.

So there's no reason for the term "unhoused" it's not meant to be used instead of "homeless". If a term is said to be preferred you really don't think people will take that to heart and tell others to use it? You're being purposely obtuse, I suspect.

I agree with you! I don't use the term "unhoused." I agree that people should not "correct" plain English with not-plain English. If someone else wants to say it, they can have at it. It's no skin off my nose. But how is any that a problem for Democrats writ large?

Because it's coming from Democrats (the left generally) and it's pissing people off.

So it's a problem for all Democrats? Instead of just a poor interaction with a particular person? Can you at least see the problem I have with that?

Do you have the word "example" in your vocabulary? Because that one would actually be a good one to add. Yes, it's a problem it happens enough that there's a broad general conversation about it.

OK I'm honestly not trying to poke you, and I sense I am so I'll leave this. I only want to say that the demands to insist that people say or not say certain things are pretty much per se unreasonable. Regardless of where they come from.

Because assholes vote.