The far left created a bad faith purity test and as a result did everything they could to elect Trump, enable ethnic cleansing in Gaza and killing as many Palestinians as possible Screaming "genocide" while actively supporting the worst outcome just makes you look like you have a mental illness
You’re a genocide denier. You know what happens to genocide deniers?
we didnt support the worst outcome. we wanted Harris to stop doing a genocide so she could persuade a lot of a people to vote for her. you act like we all held a conference.
Yes you did "We wanted Harris to stop doing a genocide" why do you write sentences that could only come from someone who is mentally ill?
why is it mentally ill to want a candidate for President of the United States of America to stop supporting a genocide? i mean, you know, aside from the fact that America has a long history of supporting and committing genocide
Bestie what the actual fuck are you talking about?? Wanting to see the White house distance itself from what is WIDELY acknowledged to be an American backed and funded genocide is actually probably the most normative foreign policy stance you could ask for..
it felt like a reasonable ask to me, too.
@robinsonreynolds.bsky.social I noticed you never replied to this but instead chose to reply to people you think you can split hairs with. Maybe u could address why you think "wanting the white house to publicly distance itself from an American backed and funded genocide" is a weird voting stance?
Cause Harris was a better candidate on Gaza, without any question. If you actually cared about the Palestinians you would have done anything to support her cause Trump was actively calling for a total ethnic cleansing of Gaza during the campaign.
that's not what they asked you
So you're not answering the question, "Why is it a weird policy position to want the white house to distance itself from an ongoing genocide?" The Palestinians I know also did not support Harris who openly courted Netanyahu. So, please try again, this time answer the asked question.
its not our fault we're better at predicting elections than democeats
that "purity test" would have saved you from losing
Nah the far left would have moved the goalposts again and again cause it was just an extension of the Trump campaign. 2000, 2016, 2024 the far left has a beautiful legacy of screwing over the country with bullshit temper tantrums that they always regret.
Yeah man George W Bush was great Keep arguing that
Why are you blaming leftists instead of the Supreme Court for Bush?
You people aren't Americans are you?
You people? Fuck you.
yeah literally what
your precious Dems rehabilitated that guy, you didn’t get the memo?
You guys keep having to lie to try to make your points it really cuts your argument
"He's so sweet! He makes paintings and hands out candy." These are things I know because of Democrat "rehabilitation".
2000 the election was stolen by SCOTUS. 2016 the DNC internally torpedoed a broadly popular candidate in order to coronate Clinton who ran a campaign predicated on peeling rightwing suburban voters from Republican districts - a losing gambit. 2024 Democrats decided to run it back again.
2000 was only stolen by Scotus cause Florida was so close because of Ralph Nader. 2016 Bernie lost fairly cause the base of the party (Black women) didn't support him.
For some reason you braindead liberals hold the contradictory beliefs that: A) the “far left” is a demographic big enough that it has repeatedly lost Democrats national elections, and B) that it is too insignificant to ever be courted on the broadly popular policy it hinges its voting leverage on.
You wouldn't know bad faith if you were an Israeli managed persona
You don't seem to know how to speak English
