avatar
Fyodor @fyodor.bsky.social

Right. There are major structural reasons why it is hard to get rid of senior leadership even if they aren't doing a good job.

aug 30, 2025, 1:33 pm • 30 1

Replies

avatar
SDE @defuncteconomist.bsky.social

A lot of it is US campaign finance laws I think www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

aug 30, 2025, 2:40 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

Precisely! That's often why places implement hard retirement ages, because it becomes very hard to tell a powerful senior person that they've gotta give it up.

aug 30, 2025, 1:36 pm • 38 0 • view
avatar
工an Monroe 🚰 @eean.dev

And it's specifically the powerful, why it's a -cracy. Simultaneously everyday old people face unfair agism!

aug 30, 2025, 1:41 pm • 24 0 • view
avatar
Darth Hippy @darthhippy.bsky.social

Then there's all the powerful courtiers they have placed around them so they don't have to do the actual work.

aug 30, 2025, 1:56 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
ciarangallagher.bsky.social @ciarangallagher.bsky.social

Also, this is a traditionally conservative argument, but within a democracy it is dangerous if a non-worker majority can vote itself funding from a laboring minority.

aug 30, 2025, 2:14 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Position Light @prrsignal.bsky.social

Retirement should be based on WAR not age. (Wins above replacement executive.) Someone doing a bad job doesn't imply their replacement will do better!

aug 30, 2025, 2:40 pm • 0 0 • view