Profile banner
Profile picture

Quinta Jurecic

@qjurecic.bsky.social

Writing about law and democracy at The Atlantic, previously Lawfare. Not a lawyer. It's KWIN-ta. signal: qjurecic.32

created May 7, 2023

80,328 followers 1,775 following 6,111 posts

view profile on Bluesky

Posts

Profile picture Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a lorg floof (@evanbernick.bsky.social) reposted

Courts still matter.

1/9/2025, 3:31:27 PM | 1277 221 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

Minute Order: The court is taking a nap

1/9/2025, 1:17:25 AM | 196 4 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Kelsey Atherton (@atherton.bsky.social) reposted

Revitalization of nostalgic jugband styling in the wale of stomp-clap-hey? Irregular formations with anti-neoconfederate intent? Combat fashion as contrast and spectacle? Oh band of brothers, where art thou? It's time for someone in Washington to found the District Zouaves.

A collage of public domain art of American Zouaves, with the text
31/8/2025, 6:17:18 PM | 95 13 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Andy Craig (@andycraig.bsky.social) reposted

This is a real danger but to jamelle's point in this thread, folks often don't appreciate the scale of American elections: how many polling places, election workers, and decentralized redundancies, and how little of it is under any federal control. It far outstrips federal manpower in its vastness.

31/8/2025, 6:51:46 PM | 956 163 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

I know why it hasn't happened. I've been following it closely and reporting on it. This was a joke meant to direct attention to the action of the appeals court

31/8/2025, 7:03:57 PM | 3 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

Woulda been nice if we had some contempt proceedings underway by now

31/8/2025, 6:23:23 PM | 665 107 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Anna Bower (@annabower.bsky.social) reposted

DEVELOPING: Advocates are seeking a court order to block the Trump administration’s effort to deport hundreds of unaccompanied minor children to Guatemala. Judge abruptly moved 3 pm hearing up to 12:30 after she was notified that some children “are in the process of being removed" today.

MINUTE ORDER: The Court received notification that putative class members are in the process of being removed from the United States. The hearing previously set for August 31, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom 14 has been rescheduled to August 31, 2025, at 12:30 p.m. in Courtroom 14 before Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan. Zoom information will be emailed to the parties. Signed by Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan on 8/31/2025. (Icak) (Entered: 08/31/2025)
31/8/2025, 4:33:54 PM | 3655 1427 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Costa Samaras (@costasamaras.com) reposted

Executive Orders are not laws and do not rule Here’s what would rule: an affordable small plates bar near Lafayette Park in downtown DC serving a taste of the French countryside called: Executive Hors d'Oeuvres

31/8/2025, 1:56:34 PM | 431 64 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

I made a spreadsheet of all the federal cases filed as part of Trump's DC crackdown. It's not going great

31/8/2025, 12:57:04 PM | 557 199 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

I really need to read more on Poland! Though I’m hesitant to use any European comparisons bc I think a colonial society with a significant amount of ethnic/racial diversity is a big component of the particular issue here

31/8/2025, 1:20:53 AM | 3 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

Hungary is small, it’s ethnically homogenous, it gets money funneled in from the EU…

31/8/2025, 1:18:57 AM | 63 1 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

I continue to think that Hungary is not hugely useful as a comparative case study for the US and that India (h/t @polgreen.bsky.social) and perhaps Brazil are more useful comparisons

31/8/2025, 1:14:42 AM | 119 9 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

Also, Orban was able to cement his power early on thanks to a parliamentary supermajority that allowed Fidesz to rewrite the constitution to lock in their advantages (even though this may now be fading). There’s not really anything comparable in the US system

31/8/2025, 1:13:23 AM | 421 70 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

I wrote this weeks after trump won in 2016 and almost ten years later I still think there is basically nothing more to say, not because I am super smart but because this is all so very empty and stupid www.lawfaremedia.org/article/bull...

31/8/2025, 1:09:23 AM | 461 76 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Disco Elysium Quotes (@discoelysiumbot.bsky.social) reposted

MEASUREHEAD - “THE PAST IS MADE OF STATIC IMAGES, DISTORTED MEMORIES, DEMENTED NOSTALGIA. THIS, THE PRESENT -- WITH ALL ITS POSSIBILITIES, INNUMERABLE HITS AND MISSES -- IS FAR SUPERIOR. IT IS A *LIVING* ORGANISM.”

30/8/2025, 6:15:57 PM | 77 14 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) reposted

"The Court And The Parties Discussed The Current Posture Of This Matter."

30/8/2025, 12:32:03 AM | 103 12 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Sharon (@sharonk.bsky.social) reposted

okay i should be logged off but incredible things are happening on the other site

 Leading Report @LeadingReport · 17m BREAKING: U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that President Trump’s global tariffs are illegal. Hillbilly @safety3rdmoto · 3m @grok can a federal appeals court judge overrule a presidential executive order? Grok @grok Yes, federal appeals courts can review and invalidate presidential executive orders if they violate laws or the Constitution, as in this tariff ruling by the Federal Circuit. It's paused until Oct 14 for a possible Supreme Court appeal. 6:02 PM · Aug 29, 2025 · 53 Views Hillbilly @safety3rdmoto · 58s @grok what’s the name, gender, and political party of this judge?
29/8/2025, 10:06:10 PM | 533 53 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney.bsky.social) reposted

BREAKING: Appeals court rejects Trump’s authority to impose sweeping tariffs under IEEPA. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

29/8/2025, 9:31:55 PM | 2339 666 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Ben Penn (@benjaminpenn.bsky.social) reposted

Update from @maiaspoto.bsky.social: LA federal defenders, citing Alina Habba opinion (& our reporting on Acting US Atty Essayli "overruling the findings of the govt’s own agents & line prosecutors), asks court to disqualify Essayli as chief LA prosecutor news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/j...

29/8/2025, 8:45:37 PM | 37 14 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Ryan J. Reilly “paints a vivid and urgent portrait of… disarray” (@ryanjreilly.com) reposted

Art depicting “Sandwich Guy” now at the scene of the alleged misdemeanor.

image
29/8/2025, 5:55:18 PM | 18629 3255 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Lawfare (@lawfaremedia.org) reposted

In 1 hour, join @benjaminwittes.lawfaremedia.org, @sranderson.bsky.social, @annabower.bsky.social, James Pearce, Loren Voss, and @qjurecic.bsky.social will discuss the legality of the White House canceling $4.9B in foreign aid, this morning's hearing over Fed gov. Lisa Cook's firing, and more.

29/8/2025, 7:00:09 PM | 28 9 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a lorg floof (@evanbernick.bsky.social) reposted

This is THE question for a lot of lower court judges evaluating the administration’s power grabs, and it truly sucks

29/8/2025, 3:41:09 PM | 294 62 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

in fairness, those investigation take a long time, and we wouldn't necessarily know if there was one ongoing. the eastman disbarment took over three years and still hasn't been finalized

29/8/2025, 3:29:08 PM | 3 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Brad Heath (@bradheath.bsky.social) reposted

A federal grand jury has declined to indict another person arrested as part of President Trump's D.C. crime surge. This was the only case we know of in which the National Guard participated in an arrest. After the grand jury declined to return an indictment, DOJ moved to dismiss the case.

image
29/8/2025, 1:54:09 PM | 2287 615 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Joshua Smith (@smithmachine.bsky.social) reposted

This is illegal. www.gao.gov/blog/what-po...

29/8/2025, 1:41:08 PM | 924 306 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Richard Primus (@richardprimus.bsky.social) reposted

This week, the Trump Administration (1) offered a military funeral with honors to Ashli Babbitt, a J6 rioter, and (2) hung a portrait of Robert E. Lee at the Pentagon. Makes sense. They both served the same cause: assault on the constitutional government of the United States.

29/8/2025, 1:31:52 PM | 140 38 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

oh come on www.nytimes.com/2025/08/29/u...

29/8/2025, 1:32:01 PM | 1611 460 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Tracey Tully (@traceytully.bsky.social) reposted

I spent the last several days wandering around federal courthouses in NJ to see how a judicial ruling, which concluded Alina Habba had no authority to be the state’s top prosecutor, was affecting criminal cases. >> Here’s what I saw and heard. w/ @jonesieman.bsky.social

28/8/2025, 11:47:41 AM | 125 36 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Jordan Fischer (@jordanonrecord.bsky.social) reposted

BREAKING: The U.S. Attorney's Office has charged "sandwich guy" Sean Dunn with a lesser misdemeanor version of the assault charge after a grand jury refused to indict this week. Case assigned to Judge Carl Nichols. More: www.wusa9.com/article/news...

image
28/8/2025, 9:18:58 PM | 284 82 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

Just out for an evening stroll in beautiful DC, wearing my Third Amendment T-shirt so the national guard knows they can’t come sit in my couch

28/8/2025, 11:04:53 PM | 1040 102 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Phil Rocco (@philiprocco.bsky.social) reposted

The debate over how to classify the present regime in the US matters primarily because of its practical upshot. If the disagreement is really about the authoritarian “box score” (rather than direction of change), then what really matters is identifying (thus to emulate) successful resistance. (1/3)

28/8/2025, 6:19:42 PM | 127 21 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

On that we agree! Fwiw I think the particular usefulness of comparative thinking right now is to examine what does and doesn’t work to fix things. Laura Gamboa’s work is really helpful here

28/8/2025, 6:32:34 PM | 22 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

I mostly think that it's really hard to figure out where we are right now! comparative models are useful, but will only get us so far given the extent to which the US case doesn't quite match anything that's come before (previously fully consolidated democracy, very wealthy, huge and decentralized)

28/8/2025, 6:19:40 PM | 74 1 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

oh I totally agree, and we are way way farther toward the bad end of the spectrum than I would like to be

28/8/2025, 6:10:23 PM | 96 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

any argument that trump has fully consolidated authoritarian power has to contend with the fact that the government wants to deport kilmar abrego garcia to uganda but hasn't done so, because a judge told them not to

28/8/2025, 6:08:25 PM | 973 139 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

This is one of the examples where the decentralized nature of the us makes it harder to consolidate power, I think

28/8/2025, 2:56:05 PM | 18 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

state/local or federal though? morale in federal law enforcement is not good and the FBI will get even madder at him the longer he makes them write traffic tickets

28/8/2025, 2:52:19 PM | 24 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

Fwiw I don’t think he’s very popular with security services other than ICE ERO, and maybe not even them

28/8/2025, 2:50:17 PM | 38 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

the appearance of gen AI slop alongside this moment is just too perfect. it provides one of the big missing pieces of fascism that was absent from trump 1 in terms of reactionary modernism

28/8/2025, 2:09:26 PM | 96 7 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

when your politics are fundamentally aesthetic (per walter benjamin on fascism), but you lack the necessary thread of connection with reality to produce anything *besides* the aesthetic

28/8/2025, 2:05:30 PM | 296 50 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture jamelle (@jamellebouie.net) reposted

i find this image so fascinating. it is both a literal example of authoritarianism but also a second-hand reproduction of the aesthetics of other authoritarian states. it's like a simulacra of authoritarianism whose purpose is to attempt to make the simulacra real.

28/8/2025, 1:38:02 PM | 23210 6372 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Lawfare (@lawfaremedia.org) reposted

In its invasion of Ukraine, the Russian government has so far tried to avoid a general mobilization, turning to convicts to fill its ranks in return for pardons. @emilyehoge.bsky.social evaluates the implications of releasing these individuals back into Russian society.

27/8/2025, 5:14:02 PM | 62 36 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture jamelle (@jamellebouie.net) reposted

one thing i've taken away from surveys asking the public to evaluate trump's most authoritarian moves is that the ordinary americans have a much clearer sense of what's happening than most professional political observers

27/8/2025, 12:37:37 PM | 5079 955 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

fwiw my understanding is that there's a real question whether throwing an object at someone constitutes "physical contact." genuinely not clear

27/8/2025, 2:38:42 PM | 29 2 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

I believe it was salami

27/8/2025, 2:07:28 PM | 92 1 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Zack Beauchamp (@zackbeauchamp.bsky.social) reposted reply parent

Good opportunity to read this @qjurecic.bsky.social piece on how the legal system is quietly resisting Trump's weaponization www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archiv...

27/8/2025, 1:23:46 PM | 47 13 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

Second time we’ve seen this in DC. There were a spate of these in LA; I wouldn’t be surprised if we see more

27/8/2025, 1:21:18 PM | 131 15 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Anthony Michael Kreis (@anthonymkreis.bsky.social) reposted

GRAND JURY NULLIFICATION! Prosecutors Fail to Secure Indictment Against Man Who Threw Sandwich at Federal Agent www.nytimes.com/2025/08/27/u...

27/8/2025, 1:12:29 PM | 14833 3001 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture lastpositivist.bsky.social (@lastpositivist.bsky.social) reposted

It was and remains a very curious feature of the US presidential election that it was fairly transparently a "sufficiently many voters are mad about inflation" election but it was treated as a huge Zeitgeist Shift by both proponents and opponents of Trump. This led to some over-confidence from Trump

27/8/2025, 6:57:41 AM | 1832 240 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Brad Heath (@bradheath.bsky.social) reposted

National Guard soldiers called into service for President Trump's law enforcement surge in D.C. have been assigned to spread mulch at federal monuments. Normally the Park Service does that, but the administration laid off the workers. www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...

image
27/8/2025, 11:51:17 AM | 4199 2091 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Olga Nesterova (@onestpress.onestnetwork.com) reposted

National Guard is now tasked with picking up garbage in DC

26/8/2025, 10:22:56 PM | 9596 2651 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024)

26/8/2025, 7:56:30 PM | 492 105 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Joshua J. Friedman (@joshuajfriedman.com) reposted

NEW: DHS agrees in principle not to remove Kilmar Abrego Garcia from the US while an immigration judge weighs his new asylum claim and Judge Xinis adjudicates his habeas claims, a process that will likely take weeks. Details to be resolved at hearing tomorrow. www.courtlistener.com/docket/71191...

Petitioner's Proposed Schedule On August 25, 2025, Petitioner was detained by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in this district and filed a habeas petition in this Court. Later that day, the Court held a hearing in which the Court proposed that the Government file a response by August 27, 2025, Petitioner file a reply by August 28, 2025, and an evidentiary hearing be held on August 29, 2025, unless the parties agree to an alternative schedule. The parties met and conferred but were unable to reach agreement. As seen below, Petitioner was (and is) largely open to agreeing to the Government's proposed schedule, with certain modifications. The parties appear to have three main points of disagreement. First, the Government rejected any time limits on the administrative processes it proposes occur before this Court acts on the habeas petition. Petitioner is willing to agree that those administrative processes go first, so long as they do so at a reasonable pace that does not unduly delay resolution of the habeas petition. To accomplish that, and to provide certainty to the schedule, Petitioner has proposed time limits for the administrative processes. Second, the Government has refused to agree to have DHS provide a written decision explaining the result of the administrative process it proposes in its Step 2. Petitioner believes that a written decision is essential to understand the result and the rationale (if any). Third, the Government insists, as part of the scheduling order, that Petitioner cannot challenge his detention. That is not a condition Petitioner can agree to, and, in any event, that kind of substantive issue is not appropriate to resolve in a scheduling order. Petitioners propose the following schedule. Like the Government, Petitioner proposes that DHS not remove Petitioner during the pendency of administrative proceedings with DHS and the district court's resolution of this habeas petition, under the following parameters: 1. Step 1: At 5pm yesterday, Petitioner filed a motion to reopen before an immigration judge pursuant to 8 C.F.R. §1003.23(b)(4)(i), to seek asylum in the United States pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1158. Petitioner proposes that the parties allow the immigration judge to resolve that motion within two weeks from today (i.e., by September 9, 2025); if the motion is denied or remains unadjudicated after two weeks, then the parties proceed to Step 2. 2. Step 2: DHS and Petitioner complete the procedures set forth in DHS's March 30, 2025 memorandum, as modified by the July 9, 2025 email directive ( RESPONDENTS' BRIEFING SCHEDULE PROPOSAL The parties met and conferred on August 25, 2025, to discuss a briefing schedule including, as required by the Court, a date by which (1) Respondents must file a response, (2) Petitioner must file a reply, and (3) the parties must notice witnesses, as well as (4) multiple agreeable dates for an evidentiary hearing. The parties met and conferred but were unable to reach agreement. Respondents asked for Petitioner's proposal by 9:30 a.m. but did not receive it. Accordingly, Respondents submit their separate proposal. On August 25, 2025, Petitioner filed a habeas petition in this Court, alleging that Respondents violated several federal statutes and Petitioner's right to due process. Plaintiffs' claims involve complex statutory and constitutional issues that require detailed, considered briefing. To most effectively present the issues to this Court, Respondents propose the schedule below to accommodate full briefing. Respondents' proposal also builds in the opportunity for Petitioner to fully exhaust administrative relief so that the issues presented to this Court are ripe for adjudication. Respondents propose that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) would agree not to remove Petitioner during the pendency of administrative proceedings with DHS and the district court's resolution of this habeas petition under the following parameters: 1. Petitioner has filed a motion to reopen before the immigration judge. The parties would allow that request to be resolved administratively by the immigration judge. 2. If the request to reopen is denied by the immigration judge, DHS and the Petitioner would complete the procedures laid out in DHS's guidance document, as set forth in the government's stay application in United States Department of Homeland Security v. D.V.D., No. 24A1153 28-32 (May 27, 2025); see also id. at 54a-55a; DHS v. D.V.D., 145 S. Ct. 2153, 2153 (2025) (granting stay application). 3. If the proceedings before DHS do not result in relief from removal, Petitioner would file an amended habeas petition within 7 days of that denial. Respondents agree that the filing of an amended habeas petition itself would not affect the court's jurisdiction or venue. 4. Respondents would have 14 days from the filing of Petitioner's amended habeas petition to file a response. 5. Petitioner would have 7 days from the date Respondents' file their response to file his reply. 6. The Court would set the amended petition for hearing within 21 days after the briefing if complete. The parties will propose witnesses at least 7 days before the scheduled hearing. 7. The Petitioner would remain detained pending this Court's resolution of the amended petition. Notably, immigration detention pending removal is presumptively reasonable under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701 (2001), for up to six months from the date Petitioner's detention began, August 25, 2025. Petitioner has not yet spent even six days in immigration detention and the proposed schedule would permit resolution of his habeas petition before the six-month period has run. In addition, Respondents would agree to detain him within 200 miles of the Greenbelt, Maryland, courthouse to accommodate Petitioner's access to criminal and habeas counsel, if this proposal is accepted. 8. Respondents would agree not to remove Petitioner pending this Court's resolution of the amended habeas petition so long as this Court decides the matter within 30 days of the hearing.
26/8/2025, 7:53:49 PM | 429 114 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

did they miss the train

26/8/2025, 7:37:20 PM | 126 9 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture George Pearkes (@peark.es) reposted reply parent

Full statement

Read the Fed’s Full Statement on Governor Lisa Cook By Bloomberg News (Bloomberg) -- “The Federal Reserve System was established by Congress to carry out its statutory mandates—including promoting maximum employment, stable prices, and a well-functioning financial system. Congress, through the Federal Reserve Act, directs that governors serve in long, fixed terms and may be removed by the president only “for cause.” Long tenures and removal protections for governors serve as a vital safeguard, ensuring that monetary policy decisions are based on data, economic analysis, and the long-term interests of the American people. The Federal Reserve will continue to carry out its duties as established by law. Lisa Cook has indicated through her personal attorney that she will promptly challenge this action in court and seek a judicial decision that would confirm her ability to continue to fulfill her responsibilities as a Senate-confirmed member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. As always, the Federal Reserve will abide by any court decision. The Federal Reserve reaffirms its commitment to transparency, accountability, and independence in the service of American families, communities, and businesses.”
26/8/2025, 7:16:16 PM | 503 123 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Owen Barcala (@obarcala.bsky.social) reposted

Federal judges are really going to have to get over this thing with believing the feds will comply with their orders in good faith

26/8/2025, 6:30:40 PM | 171 46 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Brad Heath (@bradheath.bsky.social) reposted

The Justice Department has filed felony assault charges against a man who prosecutors say scootered up to two National Guard soldiers at D.C.'s Union Station and spat on them.

image
26/8/2025, 3:18:43 PM | 230 59 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

or is that at the agency level as well

26/8/2025, 3:47:00 PM | 6 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

there's civil liability for privacy act violations though, right?

26/8/2025, 3:46:43 PM | 13 2 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

yesterday they charged someone with a felony for "causing [an HSI agent] to fall to the ground and scrape his knee"

26/8/2025, 3:30:41 PM | 193 17 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) reposted

26/8/2025, 3:24:19 PM | 741 130 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

tl;dr of Judge Cullen's ruling in the Trump admin's case against all Maryland judges: I see what you're trying to do here and I want no part in it storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

3 The mere filing of this suit required the recusal of the entire federal bench in the District of Maryland and the assignment of this out-of-district judge who, by this designation, is theoretically empowered to enjoin his fellow district judges and, by extension, hold them in contempt for violating the court’s orders. If the case were to survive a motion to dismiss, the parties—the individual judicial defendants and principal officers of the Executive, including the Secretary of Homeland Security and the United States Attorney General—would potentially be required to sit for depositions and produce documents, including emails and other internal communications, relevant to the issuance of the standing orders and the actual reasons for filing suit. These discovery demands, in turn, would almost certainly trigger claims of privilege— executive, judicial, deliberative-process, and the like—and invariably compound this constitutional standoff into epic proportions.
26/8/2025, 2:56:01 PM | 86 15 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Kevin Collins (@kwcollins.bsky.social) reposted

Agree on this post, which if anything this is too cautious. Trump said, in his first term "Then I have an Article II, where I have the right to do whatever I want as president." You don't need to get in his head or speculate about his thinking, just read what he said out loud.

26/8/2025, 2:42:58 PM | 74 31 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

Initially there was a lot of public conversation around how the DOGE team's actions could expose them to individual legal liability. That kind of faded (for reasons I don't fully understand) but I do wonder whether at some point it will resurface

26/8/2025, 2:53:35 PM | 779 274 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

at what point does this generate a precedent re Section 230 that OpenAI really, really does not want?

26/8/2025, 2:42:41 PM | 78 7 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney.bsky.social) reposted

BREAKING: Trump-appointed judge *dismisses* DOJ lawsuit against Maryland judges over their decision to automatically pause deportation cases for 48 hours He also calls Trump and his admin's attack on judges a "smear" that is "unprecedented and unfortunate storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

image
26/8/2025, 2:21:16 PM | 3541 1012 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture David Noll (@david.noll.org) reposted

i just want to point out that, in doing so, lower courts are upholding their duty to faithfully apply the constitution and laws--and oftentimes, controlling supreme court precedent

26/8/2025, 2:17:59 PM | 550 94 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Carrie Johnson (@carriejohnson.bsky.social) reposted

'The most illegal search': Judges push back against D.C. criminal charges www.npr.org/2025/08/26/g...

26/8/2025, 9:26:38 AM | 146 43 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Casey Newton (@caseynewton.bsky.social) reposted

Regarding the liberal fantasy of saving X by posting on it more — @pbump.com has it exactly right www.pbump.net/o/the-power-...

Nor was it compelling. The central argument was that Twitter — which is no longer the Twitter of five or ten years ago both literally and figuratively — is an important element of the national conversation and that leaving it to the fringe-right and to trolls was ceding important terrain. But this idea that others could swoop in and collectively shift the conversation, beyond imposing an odd job requirement on all of us, misunderstands the nature of the change from Twitter to X. It is owned and directed by a far-right actor who bought it specifically to elevate and amplify right-wing messaging. You might as well argue that people should join the Republican Party in order to redirect it to less extreme terrain; that ship sailed a long time ago and you’re going to encounter some systemic obstacles that are beyond your persuasive powers.
25/8/2025, 5:33:43 PM | 2088 491 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

wrote this in 2023

26/8/2025, 12:52:31 PM | 22 8 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture G Elliott Morris (@gelliottmorris.com) reposted

26/8/2025, 12:36:53 PM | 1558 384 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

professional ethics as a check against encroaching authoritarianism—many people are saying

26/8/2025, 12:41:46 PM | 255 27 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

new jersey is currently operating under purge rules

26/8/2025, 12:37:44 PM | 437 122 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Jacob T. Levy (@jacobtlevy.bsky.social) reposted

TIRED: The Radical Republicans were wrong to impeach Andrew Johnson WIRED: They should have impeached him for undermining Reconstruction, not for violating the unconstitutional Tenure of Office Act. INSPIRED: The TOA was constitutional & convicting him would have saved us a lot of trouble today

26/8/2025, 1:59:06 AM | 348 46 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Andrew Lawrence (@ndrew.bsky.social) reposted

been offline for an hour or so to reflect on everything and decided that as long as the federal reserve remains independent and we keep getting commercial packages from japan that everything is going to be ok

26/8/2025, 12:45:35 AM | 914 83 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

the DC US attorney's office says that christian enrique carias torres, the moped driver arrested violently by logan circle, is a danger to the community because they saw him commit an unspecified traffic violation storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

IV. Defendant Presents a Danger to Our Community. The defendant also presents a danger to the community and a flight risk. In his short history in the United States, he has shown an absolute disregard for the rule of law. He has twice failed to appear, ignored traffic laws while operating a motor scooter, and physically and repeatedly resisted the arrest. Accordingly, there is no condition or combination of conditions that would reasonably assure that the defendant would return to court if he were released. CONCLUSION The government respectfully requests that the Court issue an Order granting its motion that the defendant be held without bond pending tria
25/8/2025, 11:39:25 PM | 153 47 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

bsky.app/profile/qjur...

25/8/2025, 10:56:44 PM | 21 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

Busy day at the US Attorney’s Office

25/8/2025, 10:56:26 PM | 31 1 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

this point—that this era is not forever and accountability can come in many forms—has for some reason proved bizarrely elusive for democrats

25/8/2025, 10:08:34 PM | 4507 958 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Jonathan Bernstein (@jonathanbernstein.bsky.social) reposted

Who knows what comes from it but Trump has (1) moved DC statehood higher on the Dem priority list; (2) given it an obvious non-partisan justification; and (3) made it more likely that neutral types will buy the non-partisan justification. Still needs unified Dem gov'ment, but if that happens...

25/8/2025, 8:44:47 PM | 336 45 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Matthew Segal (@segalmr.bsky.social) reposted

The federal system doesn't use cash bail. I fail to see how this proposal — the federal govt insisting that states use a system that the federal govt *itself* does not use — could survive even rational basis review.

25/8/2025, 3:36:27 PM | 232 68 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

the government has filed a motion to dismiss the case against Torez Riley storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

25/8/2025, 5:22:28 PM | 107 25 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) reposted

Trump's four orders today contain both a lot of words and little clear meaning. There are several alarming aspects within them. At the same time, they also contain a lot of filler that either simply states reality or sounds like it's doing something but doesn't really change anything.

25/8/2025, 4:55:38 PM | 523 130 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

there's already an exception for violent crime, which is wht Trump says he's concerned about code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/counci...

(b)(1) The judicial officer shall hold a hearing to determine whether any condition or combination of conditions set forth in § 23-1321(c) will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of any other person and the community, upon oral motion of the attorney for the government, in a case that involves: (A) A crime of violence, or a dangerous crime, as these terms are defined in § 23-1331; (B) An offense under section 502 of the District of Columbia Theft and White Collar Crimes Act of 1982, effective December 1, 1982 (D.C. Law 4-164; D.C. Official Code § 22-722); (C) A serious risk that the person will obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice, or threaten, injure, or intimidate, or attempt to threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror; or (D) A serious risk that the person will flee.
25/8/2025, 4:03:28 PM | 17 2 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

unless i'm missing something, I think there's a limit to what trump can do in terms of cash bail in dc code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/counci...

(3) A judicial officer may not impose a financial condition under paragraph (1)(B)(xii) or (xiii) of this subsection to assure the safety of any other person or the community, but may impose such a financial condition to reasonably assure the defendant’s presence at all court proceedings that does not result in the preventive detention of the person, except as provided in § 23-1322(b).
25/8/2025, 4:00:57 PM | 37 6 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Michael Paarlberg (@mpaarlberg.bsky.social) reposted

Ironically the Trump DOJ is also dropping charges on real MS-13 leaders on whom they have actual extensive evidence, in order to deport them before they can testify about their pact with Bukele. In both cases the government fears what may come out in a criminal trial.

25/8/2025, 3:20:43 PM | 142 68 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

this is the new "cheering for robert mueller and the rule of law"

25/8/2025, 3:11:08 PM | 155 6 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture The Verge (@theverge.com) reposted

Trump’s immigration crackdown could be slowing the hunt for child predators online

25/8/2025, 1:20:01 PM | 61 20 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

Ideologically pro-bully

25/8/2025, 2:22:18 PM | 16 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Zack Beauchamp (@zackbeauchamp.bsky.social) reposted reply parent

Trump doesn't have the capacity for ideological thinking in the traditional sense. But he *identifies* with leaders like Bolsonaro and Yoon, put on trial for trying to steal power. More broadly, he sees the very principle of accountability as a threat to him personally.

25/8/2025, 2:01:10 PM | 186 35 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Joshua J. Friedman (@joshuajfriedman.com) reposted reply parent

Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s new habeas petition has been assigned to Judge Paula Xinis, who presides over Abrego’s existing Maryland case.

Abrego Garcia v. Noem (8:25-cv-02780) District Court, D. Maryland Last Updated: Aug. 25, 2025, 9:04 a.m. Assigned To: Paula Xinis Citation: Abrego Garcia v. Noem, 8:25-cv-02780, (D. Maryland) Date Filed: Aug. 25, 2025 Date of Last Known Filing: Aug. 25, 2025 Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa Nature of Suit: 463 Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee Jury Demand: None Jurisdiction Type: U.S. Government Defendant
25/8/2025, 1:08:51 PM | 223 35 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Jake Grumbach (@jakemgrumbach.bsky.social) reposted

First they came for the immigrants, and I did not speak out (because the message test performed at a low percentile rank compared to other messages in our testing bank for non college men who opt into online surveys through various consumer reward programs)

25/8/2025, 1:39:42 AM | 1386 288 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

no worries!

25/8/2025, 1:13:29 AM | 1 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

it's a joke

25/8/2025, 1:08:54 AM | 2 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

ahh, I had completely forgotten about this pew study, ty!

25/8/2025, 1:02:09 AM | 4 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

if you are a blue-state governor trump hasn't threatened to deploy the national guard to your state, are you really in the running for the 2028 democratic presidential nomination?

25/8/2025, 12:56:41 AM | 234 24 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

New Jersey mentioned

25/8/2025, 12:54:20 AM | 60 7 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

historical question: when do we see the real rise of short-form video as a political medium? was it as ubiquitous in 2020 as it was now, or have tiktok and tiktok copycats gobbled up even more social media market share since then?

25/8/2025, 12:52:30 AM | 48 6 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social) reply parent

Fwiw, the Jan 6 prosecutions were way harder on the fed court in dc in terms of sheer numbers, and things held up ok (though it was a strain). Otoh at that point doj wasn’t hemorrhaging people

24/8/2025, 9:44:37 PM | 7 0 | View on Bluesky | view

Profile picture Quinta Jurecic (@qjurecic.bsky.social)

I've been wondering how long it would take for these cases to start falling apart www.nytimes.com/2025/08/24/u...

24/8/2025, 8:11:54 PM | 1045 254 | View on Bluesky | view