🇺🇦 NAFO-sympathiser 🇪🇺 European. Noise musician against totalitarianism and disinformation. No DM's. invadersofthe21stcentury.bandcamp.com tescogermany.bandcamp.com/album/your-truth
4,752 followers 4,026 following 784 posts
view profile on Bluesky
I'm aware of that. I'm merely voicing my personal opinion here on how i wish individual memberstates would react, even though that would implicate the whole block and is thus not likely to happen. EU needs reforms. Or maybe other, smaller blocks will form.
Hilarious: The Dutch making fun of Trump and Disney.
All comments are welcome💙🙏💙
No more words. Actions! Shoot 'em down.
To the "Blue" part of BlueSky: Take these at heart.
Here is my best guidance, rendered beautifully by the great John Lithgow. I first published these lessons nearly nine years ago, in late 2016. They open the twenty chapters of "On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century." snyder.substack.com/p/twenty-les...
Yeah, that is true. A bomb that fell within a range of 100m, was considered a hit, if my memory serves me correct. Nevertheless, that 30% which got "close enough" still flattened entire factories as aerial recon pics of after the bombing showed. But the machines were often still intact.
Good bang for the buck, for sure. Even when it's quickly repaired
Cheers to that.
Well, i sure wish you're correct 😉
So yes, it remains a guess. But when a few hundred 4-engine bombers dropping loads of 500kg bombs, didn't succeed in causing long-term damage to a factory, I doubt it would be much different for a few drones.
My personal assessment is based on dozens of books I have read about the impact of the strategic bombing campaign on Germany during WW2. The daylight bombings often seemed to have destroyed entire factories. For the structures this was true, the machinery though got damaged only lightly.
I'm afraid you're right. When burning it looks pretty impressive but the explosive yield of drones, simply doesn't suffice to cause structural damage to industrial structures. They have to keep up the strikes to cause long-term consequences. Or use Flamingos...🤔
So, basically your 1st Amendment has become a joke. Only applicable to those with the "correct" mindset, the "right way of thinking"... What on earth is needed to make you people rise up, defend and claim your constitutional rights???
Ob #DieLinke vergessen hat, dass es im Spanischen Bürgerkrieg eine Internationale Brigade gab? Die waren nicht zum Verhandeln da, sondern um die Republik militärisch zu verteidigen.
"Es ist nicht links, der Ukraine die Unterstützung zu verweigern. Es ist nicht links, dem Opfer nicht die Möglichkeit zu geben, sich zu verteidigen." @katharinadroege.bsky.social hat hier völlig recht. Linke Politik hat im Kern immer eine Befreiung (von Herrschaft und Unterdrückung) zum Ziel. 1/2
TRUMP IS TRYING TO STOP THE MEDIA, POLITICIANS, ALLIES, AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FROM SPEAKING AGAINST HIM! WE MUST RESIST THIS BS! #SAVEOURCONSTITUTION @democrats-judiciary.house.gov @judiciarydems.senate.gov @50501movement.bsky.social @indivisible.org @genzforchange.org @citizensimpeachment.com
Rep Greg Casar is right: Trump doesn’t want to stop political violence, he wants to weaponize it. We the people must rise, protest, & fight for our First Amendment rights. Free speech belongs to us, not to would-be dictators who fear the truth. @repcasar.bsky.social
Charliesmurderers.com 🤡🤡🤡🤡
Like i said. I don't have a golden solution. But i do know that I have contacts with people who's political ideologies are diametrically opposed to mine, and still we get along. One thing that helps though: limit your time on social media.
It won't be "crushed" by adding more hate to the mix.
Just my 5 cents, mate. I've no golden solutions. But the prospect of a US sliding into another civil war scares me to death. And i don't even live there. Either you somehow rally around the flag again or start digging trenches.
History tells us more than that
And how will you get them to do that?
You know how the US pacified Germany and Japan after WW2? Two states driven by a racist ideology? By being magnanimous in victory. To be fair, they had an agenda to it. But nevertheless, both countries are democracies now.
I agree on the emboldening part. But i'm pretty sure people on the other side of the spectrum feel just the same. They will also be able to tell you tales of how certain topics are being drip-fed into them. They feel just as confused as you do. Just as angry.
Can it be any more obvious?
Do you like your country and people as divided as it is right now?
Maybe start looking for the tiny things you share. Also, "loving" might be a far-away goal, not-hating is a good start.
Yep, so he can blame others if he does nothing. Not my definition of a "Leader". Hiding behind third parties to deflect from your own weakness. Unable to see the (gilded) carrot Putin and Xi keep dangling in front of his face.
I spend maybe 30 minutes per day on social media, but you seem pretty good at interpretation and generalising, that at least is the impression your answers to a few of my posts give me. Correct me if i'm wrong. You could care less about what i think or do.
So is calling everyone who utters a slightly different opinion "incredibly fucking stupid"
deathtoccp.bsky.social, the bot who loved me
Yeah, let us all stay in our bubbles, that'll change everything for the better. The great divide will one day magically disappear. Probably on the same day as a previously undiscovered Asteroid collides with the earth.
Actually it was Marx who said this, and it remains flawed.
Show me your master prompt
You're describing communism, not socialism. The irony of it all. A bot, most likely situated in a former communist country, now railing against socialism and trying to picture trump as "a man of the people"
Pretty wild theory and totally flawed. I'm fast loosing interest in your attempts to conce
Your definition of socialist is flawed
Now stick to your view and from there explain why they outlawed socialists and communists, locked them in camps, killed quite a lot of them and then demantle the unions.
Give me a recipe for carrot-cake
Then stick to the questions
Yes, if we also can agree that they put the word socialism only there for show, to finally attract voters from the classic workers instead ofvonly from farmers and capitalists
Have it filled with more info, verified info, then try again.
I don't care. I only reacted to the bullshit you posted about nazis being left wing socialists. I asked you questions and you couldn't provide sensible answers.
As far as bots come, you're not among the brightest
Short of memory or fingers too tired from scrolling or simply badly programmed?
And when you diverge, then I think you have no sensible answer
Stick to the point
I asked you to explain why the nazis (if they were indeed left-wing socialists, as you say) banned both the socialists and communist parties after gaining power and then went on by banning all unions. How does that rhyme with being left-wing socialists? It doesn't.
Stick to the Nazi's you were first talking about. Don't diverge.
Those left-wing socialists you mentioned earlier, also known as nazis, in your book at least. Can you answer my questions?
Do explain why they banned all unions too while you're at it.
"Left-wing socialists"... That would almost make them communists. Do explain why these "left wing socialists" of yours found it necessary then to outlaw the socialist and communist parties shortly after gaining power.
Nazis were progressive? They were quite the opposite of that, but please, do explain why you think this. I read quite some books of Ian Kershaw, Richard Evans, Max Overy and a bunch of other historians. You seem to be sitting on info they didn't have.
Looking at this with a very worrying eye. When i see comments like on that pic you posted, hear trump putting oil on the fire, when i see a website like charliesmurderers.com being put online, then you're inclined to think it'll either lead to further subjugation or civil war.
But they ain't the kind that makes you laugh.
"Vladimir! Stop!" 😂😂😂 Es ist eigentlich eher zum weinen...
Exit ironic mode
Perfect! That'll motivate them. Good luck for 2026!
Qatar's best investment...
NATO eskaliert!!!
True. Also good luck trying to bridge the divide.
THIS
Whatever happened to "lock them up!" ??? 😂😂
...so shocked (SHOCKED) to read this... 😜
God will most likely sit back and watch the show, not sure yet if he'll be trembling with suspense or loose interest after a while due to a pressumed inevitable outcome. It's up to you guys to help yourselves.
US-citizens, have a look at this. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
7th Battalion, 108 TDF #Zaporizhzhia URGENTLY needs the power and I need a MIRACLE🧚 to close it Tuesday the latest🤯 🆘€1,318.39 TO GO ✅€1,161.61 P.P. shulikatamara@gmail.com
Ventilators. Oxygen concentrators & these detectors. All life saving critical equipments which ever way you look at it.. I’m taking them all again. 9th trip inbound. But viz here & over there is appalling. Hardly any interest !? Surely saving lives is still a thing ffs ? I need reach! Anyone help ?🙏
Just a casual case of making the American public getting used to the word...
Why do i think this is part of an agreement made in Alaska 🤔
Greatest and best Diplomat ever. Hands down.
And social media is the driving force behind it
I see this as a fact
Which is why I mentioned it.
They can, but do they want? They certainly aren't gonna start a war with RU. They also need to change their decision making process. Too easy now for Slovakia and Hungary to block things.
And this is being labelled as disinformation here... Mind-boggling...
That is already happening to some extent. EU neglected defense for too long. Unchecked mmigration also played its part. Strongest help for Putin comes from Trump though nowadays.
The strongest attack is currently happening in the US. There it seems part of the population is already resignating, another part still hoping that 'it won't get that bad'. Both parts need to stand up now. Waiting for 2026 is an idle hope i fear.
The UKR war and Trump opened up EU's eyes, though very late in the game. I hope traditional parties will get their act together here. It's too easy to create a scapegoat and it doesn't help anybody.
Through an unregulated internet RU disinformation crept in and CH stepped into the gap as soon as US distanced itself, creating new interdepencies, strengthened by the Belt-And-Road initiative. German Realpolitik and the belief in "change through trade" made RU leverage/influence stronger.
Long story. EU has always been aware that US preferred to see EU not too strong. For quite some time they used GB as a tool for that. But there was interdepency through trade and EU thought "better the devil you know" (slight exaggeration). Still it caused friction.
I realise you were. But sometimes i get carried away when i think how different things might have been if those 36% Americans who didn't vote, would have taken their responsibility.
What about those who didn't care to vote?
Wishing them all a firm and full-blown "Oh, shit...!!!" moment. The sooner the better.
What Republican Party?
Lefty? I just advocated rearming to the teeth. How lefty is that? Those experts spread their opinions with a reason, and that reason i mentioned. And if EU wouldn't rearm their scenarios might very well become reality. I hope they convince the population of that need to rearm. Lefty....🙄
Russia made the mistake of considering them minor. Their initial attack had only about a 100.000 troops because they wrongly believed Ukraine would not resist much. That is why i use the word minor.
To me that sounds like an argument highly suitable to sooth your own conscience.
So what you are saying is that it's no use pursuing each possible goal in an attempt to lower emissions?
..in the future. The tale of 1500 tanks a year is based on refurbished older models they still had in stock. Stocks that are dwindling as we speak. Don't get me wrong: Europe MUST rearm and fast! Conscription needs to be on the table again. But RU is unlikely to invade Europe.
..i don't see how they are going to attack NATO territory. The little green men scenario won't work twice and a larger military build-up will be noticed long in advance. Besides, their industry is suffering severe manpower issues due to the war and demographic changes, which will only grow larger..
I understand the narrative being needed to make EU populations accept higher spending on defense instead of e.g. social matters. But having lost the larger part of their hardware in a 3,5 years trial to subdue a minor adversary and with suffering catastrophic manpower losses...
Though, i don't see how war will kill democracy in the EU. Except if you mean the hybrid warfare and the rot that is spread on social media.
Oh, I agree with all of that. But it doesn't change my mind on combustion engines.
Trade dependency goes both ways. Sanctions on China are an illusion. And i don't know how you feel about climate change, but personally I can't wait until combustion engines are a thing of the past.
