Fair. But Miller runs WeAreFairCop whose online activity is pure Naziism.
Trans girl (she/her) of the Portsmouth elders. "Pawn of a satanic new world order". Ocassional amateur journalist: https://rgellman.medium.com Heterosexual panromantic. It's complicated.
665 followers 361 following 1,511 posts
view profile on Bluesky
Fair. But Miller runs WeAreFairCop whose online activity is pure Naziism.
My money's on Harry Miller.
Breaking news!!! We have no idea who it is, honestly guvβ
Or "gender critical". There are groups dedicated to this practice, such as Sex Matters and LGB Alliance.
Actually I think he's on that list for thinking being a fact-ignoring transphobic shitstain is "normal".
This orphaned reply to a long-lost post deserves to be read and remembered.
lol
And it's a no from me.
Not only do we have Sandy Balls, but we are also Lower Upham. At least we didn't name part of a city "Pity Me" (Durham).
THIS! Is the plain spoken truth telling I was posting about the other day here, the sort that everyone from White House press corps reporters to the person on the street needs to see, here and say. Quite an excellent op-ed. Coudn't have written it better myself! @velshimsnbc.bsky.social
Someday people will realise that "trans" is not an antonym of "biological"
No, I'm realistic.
OK, hear me out - a Lord of the Rings remake, but with these two taking the One Ring to Mordor:
No, not your tactics, actually debunked.
This claim was debunked like 5 years ago, and you're still clinging to it like a sad lonely limpet.
ππ
Well played.
![Just Stop Oil @JustStop_Oil tweets: Aug 27 So you're saying if we'd sprayed stuff white and then put a red cross on it the media would have supported us? You live and learn I guess. [Below, a roundabout in England painted with St George's flag]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:ysg7hp6kgncoryoll2fz2pgk/bafkreigk4oedxcpckuvxaegjqc4atmjkfmb3guwybbialo6o5aiaq6m5jq@jpeg "Click to view full size")
*snort*
Dear YouTubers, You think you have mastered a seamless transition to advertising. You haven't. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
"Hi, I'm here to report on 1996."
If Transphobes Can't Read picked up on it, I find your claim hard to believe.
Not from where I'm sitting. After I trace back through all the quotes, I get to a blocked post where you seem to be angering an account called "Transphobes Can't Read". Ne c'est pas?
OK... WHY are you making that point?
Men aren't trying to compete in women's sports. So what point are you making?
You're still talking about men. Trans women are not men in dresses. Until you grasp that basic fact, you're going to be continually ignorant.
"Oh stop being melodramatic and hyperbolic. Nobody's trying to k!ll you or wipe you from existence. We just want to teach the world that you're a threat for no good reason so that it happens anyway!" I genuinely don't know what's going to happen next, but it will be terrible for someone.
Why are you looking for evidence regarding teenage boys beating women? This has nothing to do with whether trans women have an unfair advantage. Unless you're an ignorant twonk who thinks a trans woman is a man in a dress.
*taps sign*
Thread for the age.
πΆ in the village, the peaceful village, the lion sleeps toniiiiiight, aaah ooo eee aaaπΆ
We're going to be penalised anyway.
Sorry, but your response reads like "can't we just quietly protest in a way that can be more easily ignored?". We've reached the point where the government is coming for us whether we are quiet or not. I choose not to be quiet.
I declare that I will not comply with any order requiring me to deny my own legal rights, and that I do not recognise the authority of a ruling based on provably, factually false concept as a means to force me to do so.
I fully intend to refuse compliance with the idea that the Supreme Court ruling in FWS vs Scottish Ministers requires me to stay out of women's spaces. The Equality Act is clear that I have a right to use those spaces, and that suppressing that right has a VERY high bar for validity. 1/
That last line is screaming "Grok keeps exposing us as liars".
I'm ded π π π π
realistic Star Trek
Reading the US Declaration of Independence is fascinating. Everything Trump is doing to America are reasons why America declared independence from Great Britain.
We are still considering protesting again this year. Newry pride is run by a woman's group. A woman's group who do not support trans people comes under only one umbrella to me!! Vile π€’ #whentransrightsareunderattackstandupfightback β€οΈπ³οΈββ§οΈβ€οΈ
HOMOPHOBIC WOKE PARENTS ARE FORCING THEIR GAY KIDS TO TURN TRANS! By me and @postcardsbybecky.bsky.social Read more cartoons! ---> #PoliCartoon Help us make more! ----> patreon.com/barry
"I think you shouldn't be permitted to exist" is one fucking massive thing to overlook when voting for who gets to control my life, Sir.
Sarah Phillimore is pure evil. She invited me to explain the trans position against GC ideology to her once. So I very patiently detailed how GC ideology conflicts with evidence, etc. She told me "thank you for taking the time, but I prefer my version". This was when I realised GC is an ideology.
Remember when we said they wanted to round up every trans person and people said we were being hyperbolic? But sure, reasonable concerns about sport etc etc
Ok but what in the actual did I just read?
This is grim. Western governments are complicit in so much more than war crimes.
GOOD NEWS! For the FIRST time ever, and after MORE THAN 30 YEARS of HIV vaccine clinical trials, researchers have developed a vaccine that has SUCCESSFULLY generated TIER 2 broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) against HIV and BLOCKS viral infection in vaccinated PEOPLE.
The use of the word "MatinΓ©e" from the French word "matin", meaning "morning" being used to describe a film being shown IN THE FUCKING AFTERNOON is sending me.
Theπsecondπamendmentπcan'tπbeπrepealedπinπcaseπofπaπtyrannicalπgovernmentπ
For avoidance of doubt, I have a photo here of the fucks I have to give regarding Taylor Swift:
Is that why they hit it a second time after medics moved in, you gullible fucks?
Got a non-capitalist version that works from outside the US?
*don't *we're
If Labour didn't reverse course on our rights, were fucked anyway. At least the Schadenfreude gives us something to bargain with.
'wah, wah, ref... reform might take away my rights!' - cis ppl
*crickets*
[citation needed]
Kenyan court orders trans rights bill in landmark legal ruling https://www.thepinknews.com/2025/08/26/kenyan-court-orders-trans-rights-bill-in-landmark-legal-ruling/?utm_content=1756208400&utm_medium=social&utm_source=bluesky
Making the vital points there.
I thought we were talking about your guy Gavin Newsome?
I want you to go up to a mirror and say the following to yourself: "I believe that trans people should be persecuted to death because the guy I'm voting for is good to me". Let me know when you realise what a tool you are.
This is very much dependent on the highly debateable idea that our current MPs are shameable.
At this point multiple studies have found no connection between mental illness and mass shootings. None. Most mass shootings are committed by neurotypicals. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/202...
If you don't love Nigel Farage give this a Like. If you hate him, give it a RT.
Can you explain this marvel of time travel? "Hamas's actions on 7/10/2023 caused the preceding 75 years of Israeli persecution". How does that work then?
"Mamdani supports Hamas" [citation needed] I'll lay money your claim is based solely on either "he's a Muslim" or "he opposes genocide" and nothing else.
To clarify: By "50% of the vote", I don't mean of_those_who_voted. I mean 50% of the_voting_capable_public. If you can't even get people to turn out, you suck even more.
a. I don't think you could do a worse job. b. I'd vote for that.
Or both.
ORRR, she's whinging about being called out for being a rabid transphobe again, and thinks she can call us racists to get out of it. aka The Alison Bailey Manoeuvre.
I think there's a simple solution for this: If you don't get at least 50% of the vote, you're not allowed to win. If none of the candidates win over the majority of the public, then the candidates are abhorrent assholes and should be disqualified, and a new election held with new candidates.
By "moved past" you mean "graduated from".
It lukt liek cheez. But was furball.
This is nice to see.
By repeating its taking points? How's that work?
Dude. You had 3 months to say what you would accept as proof. You failed. You're a nobody and a failure. It confirms nothing because I'm still British. You are now blocked.
Youβre telling me this guy is not a more desirable guy to promote than Gavin Newsom
This is brilliantly well done π I would also recommend this version: www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQkF...
Okay, I've seen other sketches with this basic premise, but execution is all and this cracked me up. www.youtube.com/watch?v=75UZ...
So this transphobe threatened me with violence. This didn't stop me attending my bra fit.
Ok, but it needs to be called the Dr. Pepper Act of 1983. And yes, I know that specific ad campaign didn't exist in 1983.
Guy doesn't understand that museums are definitionally about the past and not the future.
OWCH. GET 'IM MAMDANI!
"Don't you dare point out relaity! I can't handle reality!"
Go fuck thyself.
"I can't be racist, I have a friend who's black!" Mate, you know a couple of people out of a massive population. You know fuck all.
Bigots don't care - they only care that you're defying gender expectations. FACT. End of story.
"Look this thing is trans and it agrees with me!"
Bigots: I don't care about the nuance. You're all gender-defying and you need to be eliminated. You: But but
I think you tagged the wrong Aaron ;)
"I exist" is the best I can give you.
What's that? Legal permission to point guns at ICE?
Dude. You've have 3 months to tell me what you would accept as proof. In THREE MONTHS you have been unable to specify. You ain't winning this one. Money where your mouth is. If next time I see you, you haven't specified what you will accept as proof, I will block you. This ball's in your court.
Dude. You've have 3 months to tell me what you would accept as proof. In THREE MONTHS you have been unable to specify. You ain't winning this one. Money where your mouth is. If next time I see you, you haven't specified what you will accept as proof, I will block you. This ball's in your court.
*gestures to the UK* Don't go there.
LETRUNE!!!! *running hug o plenty*
Don't forget to tell them they're not allowed to leave that hotel room.
One of my mum's carers is 6 ft 5 (not a typo). She's a cis woman. I guess she's part of the gender ideology now?
They tried to make out it was in a "women only" section, and tried to strongly imply she was angling to do a teen's bra fitting.