False Equivalence.
BlueSky = BlockSky Facts Over Feelings If you're here to check my bio, you're most likely planning an ad hominem attack.
25 followers 25 following 2,179 posts
view profile on Bluesky
False Equivalence.
Are you opposed to the decrease in crime?
Those "crime stats" are currently under review.
No. Why? Are you opposed to the decrease in crime?
"looking for trouble" Ironically, you just described Joseph Rosenbaum. Not Rittenhouse.
Rittenhouse wasn't in possession of an assault rifle. It was SEMI-AUTO. A handgun would've been illegal for Kyle to possess. There was no evidence presented during the trial to suggest that Kyle was looking for trouble. Otherwise, PROVE IT.
"Crime is way down in DC" I'm glad that you agree. The plan was effective.
All the people who woke up today in DC that weren't murdered or the victim of a violent crime would disagree.
All the people who woke up today in DC that weren't murdered or the victim of a violent crime would disagree. The NG isn't enforcing any laws. They are there to assist LE.
That's an odd way of admitting that you lied. 😂 Self defense isn't murder. In fact, there's an entire state statute that covers this. You should read it.
That's exactly what happened. Despite proof of the contrary, you still maintain that Rittenhouse crossed state lines with a firearm.
@entus.bsky.social ⬇️ I can dismiss proof just like you did with Rittenhouse. 😂
Why would you be opposed to the decrease in crime?
Are you opposed to the decrease in crime?
*Justifiably kill.
Were you this upset when Pence lost his Secret Service detail in July 2021? I doubt it. Educate yourself. ⬇️ www.congress.gov/bill/110th-c...
Were you this upset when Pence lost his Secret Service detail in July 2021? I doubt it. Educate yourself. ⬇️ www.congress.gov/bill/110th-c...
Were you this upset when Pence lost his Secret Service detail in July 2021? I doubt it. Educate yourself. ⬇️ www.congress.gov/bill/110th-c...
Non sequitur.
You can't fix political bias. People like this evaluate every situation through a political lens. It's permanently attached.
Your OJ comparison is absurd. The Rittenhouse case wasn't a "whodunit." -Did OJ have witnesses, videos & drone footage of him being attacked unprovoked? No. Rittenhouse did. -Did OJ claim self defense? No. Rittenhouse did.
Oh, I wasn't aware that you're willfully ignorant. Thanks for the heads up. 👍
For Rittenhouse to be a murderer, you'd have to explain why the self-defense statute shouldn't have applied to him. Are you prepared to do that?
FMCSA rule 391.11(b)(2), the English language proficiency requirement for commercial drivers, has existed since 1936.
FMCSA rule 391.11(b)(2), the English language proficiency requirement for commercial drivers, has existed since 1936. Trump was 10 yo at the time. Logic would dictate that Trump had nothing to do with this law.
Yet, Harjinder Singh failed the test, dimwit!
I'll debate you on any subject as long as I can nullify any evidence that doesn't support my argument. Just like you did with Rittenhouse. Deal?
EO 14160 doesn't exist.
Were you this upset when Pence lost his Secret Service detail in July 2021? I doubt it. Educate yourself. ⬇️ www.congress.gov/bill/110th-c...
Did you feel the same when Democrat Governor Hochul activated the National Guard & stationed them in the NYC subway system?
@janusstone.bsky.social , an attorney for 35 yrs couldn't prove their theory. Instead, they resorted to the block feature.
@janusstone.bsky.social , an attorney for 35 yrs couldn't answer a simple question regarding the law. Instead, resorted to the block feature.
Could you explain why the self-defense statute shouldn't have applied to Rittenhouse shooting Rosenbaum?
Yet, there was no evidence presented during the trial to corroborate your claim. Otherwise, PROVE IT. Kyle walked around Kenosha for 7+ hrs w/o incident. That crucial piece of evidence eluded the prosecution despite 100's of potential witnesses & tons of video evidence.
Were you this upset when Pence had his Secret Service protection end in July 2021? I doubt it.
What do you have against a clear case of self defense? Either you believe in self defense or not. Rittenhouse: -Justifiably defended himself against unprovoked attacks. -All supported by witness testimony & video evidence. -No law(s) were violated.
The truth in this thread. The fact that you still believe that Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm is all the proof I need. That's a claim that the prosecution didn't even make. 😂
Where was the energy when Biden occupied the WH?
Those are the facts.
You've already shown your lack of integrity with Rittenhouse & your refusal to accept facts. Under those conditions, I have no reason to enter into a second debate with you.
Like yours are for you? 😂
You lied. Own it & stop behaving like a petulant child.
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Is this your attempt to deflect from your ignorance? It's too late. 😂 You lied. Own it.
Yeah. Rittenhouse planned on Rosenbaum making 2 death threats followed by a sudden attack. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 You're not fooling anyone. You clearly didn't follow the Rittenhouse trial. Sit down, cupcake.
That's an odd way of admitting that you lied. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 You're an ignorant fool who clearly didn't follow the Rittenhouse trial yet feels qualified to comment on it. Find another news source. Yours lied.
That's one of the videos that was used during the trial. Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum 4x in 0.739 seconds. That's pretty quick.
@sweetjimmy72.bsky.social ⬇️ Congratulations. You just repeated the most popular media lie regarding the Rittenhouse case/trial. 😂
Sadly, your theory is based on a lie. Find another news source. Rittenhouse didn't cross state lines with a firearm. The rifle was stored in Kenosha, WI with the owner, Dominick Black. This fact was established during the opening statements of the trial you clearly didn't follow by ADA Binger.
Rittenhouse/Murder 🚫 Self defense isn't murder. In fact, there's an entire state statute that covers this. You should read it.
I imagine Rosenbaum made good on his threat when he caught Rittenhouse alone. "If I catch any of you guys alone tonight I'm going to f-cking kill you." People fall victim in crowds all the time. Rosenbaum was a violent career pedo who was just released from a mental health facility that day.
Why are you questioning if that's Rittenhouse despite ADA Binger acknowledging it? Richie McGinnis, a photojournalist, testified to this fact as well. Again, you're being willfully ignorant. How are your experiences at a protest relevant to the Kenosha riots? They're not.
Let's see if I have this right. Follow The Law = Bad Break The Law = Good Is that what you're saying? 😂 It's never socially or morally wrong to defend yourself against unprovoked attacks. Never.
You're not accepting evidence. -You discounted Officer Moretti's testimony. -Inserted your own statistic. "99.9% of the people weren't armed." -You insist that Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm. Despite evidence to the contrary. You lack integrity.
Lol. You've been trying to bait me into a political discussion for days now. Not interested. Why would I be? You're not even accepting the facts regarding Rittenhouse.
No. He didn't. Rittenhouse justifiably shot Rosenbaum at approx 11:48 pm. Kyle then ran on Sheridan Rd towards a police line. Along the way, he was attacked by Huber & Grosskreutz. They were both justifiably shot at approx 11:49 pm. The facts don't support your claim. share.google/2U3VTxs7JQ0n...
In addition to being wrong about the jury instructions in the Zimmerman case/trial, you were wrong about WI being a stand your ground state & Rittenhouse shooting black people. I stand by my original statement. You're clueless.
@bluemarlinhunter.bsky.social ⬇️ I rest my case. 😁
Why? You cited the jury instructions as proof. You were wrong. Own it.
I haven't seen you post one source to support your claim. The words "stand your ground" do not appear in the jury instructions. Are you going to question that source too? law2.umkc.edu/faculty/proj...
The words "stand your ground" do not appear anywhere in the jury instructions. Otherwise, PROVE IT. law2.umkc.edu/faculty/proj...
I did. You're still wrong.
W R O N G Being willfully ignorant isn't a good trait. abcnews.go.com/US/floridas-...
@bluemarlinhunter.bsky.social ⬇️ Stand your ground laws proliferate after Trayvon spotlight | PBS News share.google/nCmWLJSVWAhh...
I'm aware of the stand your ground principles. Zimmerman never claimed stand your ground & waived an immunity hearing. His defense at trial was always based on self defense.
Wrong. Zimmerman decided against an immunity hearing & chose to claim self defense at trial, putz.
WI is not & never has been a stand your ground state. Zimmerman did not claim stand your ground. You're still clueless.
The only nutjobs in the Rittenhouse incident were the criminals who carried out an unprovoked attack on someone who was clearly armed.
You're being willfully ignorant. It just highlights your lack of integrity. Kyle having a fire extinguisher wasn't disputed during the trial. ADA Binger acknowledged that fact. You're making claims that the prosecution didn't even make for the sake of arguing.
That's an odd way of admitting that you were wrong. 😂 Watch the video & the dialog. ADA Binger acknowledges that Rittenhouse had a fire extinguisher just before Rosenbaum's attack. Willful ignorance is not a good trait.
Let's start with Joseph Rosenbaum. He was the 1st person justifiably killed by Rittenhouse. Why was he shot? What exactly was he doing?
@aquart1.bsky.social ⬇️ bsky.app/profile/sgtw...
Clearly, you didn't watch the video I just posted. 😂 Not only does it show Rittenhouse holding a fire extinguisher but ADA Binger acknowledged it. Those facts aren't in dispute.
That's exactly what someone would say who's incapable of backing up their claims.
That's an odd way of admitting that you were wrong. 😂 @ice-scream-ghost.bsky.social ⬇️
Unless you know all the details of the Rittenhouse incident, you shouldn't have used him as a reference. That's on you.
That would qualify as a deflection. You haven't posted evidence to support your previous claims. Babbitt was wrong, BTW.
However, YOU mentioned Rittenhouse during the course of your post. I directly addressed your comments regarding Rittenhouse. Not Babbitt.
Straw Purchase 🚫 Dominick Black never relinquished ownership of the rifle to Rittenhouse. Black was the transferee/buyer until the day the rifle was destroyed. Per WI state law, Kyle was carrying a long-barreled rifle legally in an open carry state. The prosecution agreed & conceded.
I'm still waiting for you to post evidence to support your claims. No business? 😂 Says who, you? 🤣😂 Despite YOUR ignorance, Kyle had every right to be there, armed, just like everyone else. Once YOU accept that reality is the moment YOU become less ignorant.
I never commented on the Babbitt incident. I directly addressed your comments about Rittenhouse & the bag. I already proved that the bag was inconsequential to Kyle shooting Rosenbaum.
Unless you can explain why the self-defense statute shouldn't have applied to Rittenhouse shooting Rosenbaum, your opinions are irrelevant.
Non sequitur. WI is an open carry state & Kyle was amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed. There is no scenario where it's acceptable to attack someone for simply being armed. Additionally, there's no scenario where being armed forfeits your right to self defense.
Your personal beliefs on open carry are in direct conflict with the current open carry laws in WI. The laws don't care about your feelings.
You're free to prove otherwise. Oddly, you're making claims that the prosecution didn't even make. 🤔
"How did they know that he wasn't a school shooter?" Cause Kyle wasn't in a school setting. He was on a public street en route to extinguish a car fire. Even ADA Binger acknowledged that.
I literally said, "lunged for the rifle. You're ignoring the totality of Rosenbaum's actions towards Kyle that night leading up to the sudden attack. Prior to the attack, Rosenbaum made violent threats to Kyle 2x. There was no evidence presented during the trial that Kyle threatened anyone.
Rittenhouse was in the Grayslake Police Department's Explorer program and the Antioch Fire Department's cadet program. There was no evidence presented during the trial to suggest that Kyle was friends with any officers in the Kenosha PD.
Then I suggest those people stay away from open carry states. Your personal beliefs conflict with the open carry laws in WI.
You can look up the videos & photos of that night & clearly see how many people were armed. A lot. Your 99.9% claim is false.
Rittenhouse/Vigilante 🚫 Defending yourself against unprovoked attacks is not vigilante justice. You need to familiarize yourself with the self defense statute. Wisconsin Legislature: 939.48 share.google/j9w4jiRnAKCi...
The bag from the mental health facility was irrelevant & the video evidence is proof. You're ignoring the totality of Rosenbaum's actions towards Rittenhouse that night. Did Kyle shoot Rosenbaum when he threw the bag? 👎 OR When he cornered Kyle & lunged for the rifle? 👍
