avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Agreed. The National guard in LA, the EO revoking birthright citizenship, trumps conviction of rape(as said by the judge), trump falsifying documents, his illegal tariffs....those laws dont care about your feelings either. It is what it is.

aug 30, 2025, 6:29 am • 0 0

Replies

avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

Lol. You've been trying to bait me into a political discussion for days now. Not interested. Why would I be? You're not even accepting the facts regarding Rittenhouse.

aug 30, 2025, 7:44 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

No, you wont be goaded because youd be cooked. In all of the things ive mentioned, i have a stronger case than Rittenhouse. I have the constitution

aug 30, 2025, 8:12 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

You've already shown your lack of integrity with Rittenhouse & your refusal to accept facts. Under those conditions, I have no reason to enter into a second debate with you.

aug 30, 2025, 8:29 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Jason Mullagan 🐧 @jasonmullagan.bsky.social

What Constitution? He's obviously not in the USA; in no State of the Union will open carry 'get you shot'. It may cause the police to confront you and require compliance but it's not a shoot-on-sight 'provocation'.

aug 31, 2025, 7:39 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Fof example as one of the arguments I listed, EO 14160 which is blatantly unconstitutional. This guy pretends to care about the letter of the law, yet Im assuming hes fine with this unconstitutional order.

sep 1, 2025, 12:56 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

EO 14160 doesn't exist.

sep 1, 2025, 1:07 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Strange.

image
sep 1, 2025, 8:11 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

sep 1, 2025, 8:28 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

@entus.bsky.social ⬇️ I can dismiss proof just like you did with Rittenhouse. 😂

sep 1, 2025, 8:30 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

I was referring to other arguments the guy wont address cause hell get cooked. Not referring to Rittenhouse.

sep 1, 2025, 12:46 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

I'll debate you on any subject as long as I can nullify any evidence that doesn't support my argument. Just like you did with Rittenhouse. Deal?

sep 1, 2025, 1:42 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Thats not what happened.

sep 1, 2025, 8:12 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

That's exactly what happened. Despite proof of the contrary, you still maintain that Rittenhouse crossed state lines with a firearm.

sep 1, 2025, 8:31 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Uh huh. Keep telling yourself that.

aug 30, 2025, 11:54 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

The truth in this thread. The fact that you still believe that Kyle crossed state lines with a firearm is all the proof I need. That's a claim that the prosecution didn't even make. 😂

aug 30, 2025, 11:58 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

aug 31, 2025, 4:32 am • 0 0 • view