When it benefits a convicted fraud? Yes. Did I say it was mutually exclusive? Why can’t you come direct? Why can’t you have a dialogue like an adult?
Lifelong Dem, but I don’t worship public servants. I leave that to maga. Quippy sombitch ready to resist. Reappropriating the term and putting the riot back in “patriot”. Will not obey. Fuck trump. Fuck fascists.
7,217 followers 5,335 following 14,151 posts
view profile on Bluesky
When it benefits a convicted fraud? Yes. Did I say it was mutually exclusive? Why can’t you come direct? Why can’t you have a dialogue like an adult?
I think scapegoating racism and misogyny to give a career criminal and convicted fraud the benefit of the doubt is a mistake.
I think it’s time to discuss secession.
It’s not him…
Too bad their base is too incompetent to figure it out.
I’m not sure how that answers my question. If Newsom was to get the nomination, will you vote for him?
I’m not sure how that answers my question. When Obama repeatedly said that I didn’t deserve the same rights as other Americans, well into his first term, was that a non starter, and you voted for him, regardless?
In Florida, the GOP is actually paying to remove and replace colored bricks so there is no Pride walkway. They are trying to erase #LGBT people.
Not sure how he thinks he’s not already on this list, too.
They aren’t beating the Nazi rap today.
Maybe. I haven’t heard of a single campus being occupied, or Cornel West or Jill Stein holding a rally. Which is strange because things have gotten considerably worse for Palestinians. I’m probably imagining things.
Was Obama a non starter in ‘08 for you?
A mother is filing a $1 million claim after her 15-year-old son was held at gunpoint by immigration goons in Los Angeles.
🎯 She’s gonna drive her career down the middle lane, and off a political cliff, into an abyss of fascism.
In my best Cryptkeeper: It’s all par for the corpse! Hahahahahaha-ahhhhhhh!
Oh, trump? He’s been dead for months.
How does this bleached blonde saggy armed magat cunt say so much but not say anything? Listen to her temu dentures clanking around as she talks about the tax code. 🙄
It’s his best performance ever.
Yes, you’re far too important to still be spamming my mentions with your willful reading incomprehension. Off you pop.
Yeah, feel free to get your reading incomprehension out of my mentions. LOL!
Sorry about all the reality. LOL!
Blatantly unconstitutional. Facist dictatorships don't want people voting democratically. Anything to suppress votes and rig the next election.
Exactly! I can’t hammer these two points hard enough. 1. The Constitution explicitly grants election authority to the states. 2. Voter ID does nothing to secure elections. ID fraud is real.
Are we sure that isn’t actor James Woods, under the law of maga projection?
Texas and Florida have been subverting municipal rights and sovereignty for decades. Let’s not ever let republicans pass the buck on their failures.
We need greater social consciousness regarding what’s in our Constitution. This level of ignorance in the Age of Information is unacceptable.
The folks who claim to be mischaracterized as Nazis, keep acting like Nazis
Every day I’m hearing about a new republican getting in trouble for raping dozens of children, or collecting CSAM.
Promoting their other efforts. Funding, social services, abuse treatment, etc. “Clearing encampments” doesn’t convey solutions. It’s important to communicate the substantive efforts they’ve made, especially when people contend that all they’re doing is clearing encampments that pop up somewhere else
My criticism of *promoting* an effort that doesn’t convey meaningful solutions isn’t a critique of the efforts they’ve made that have been impactful. I’m making a critique of their *messaging*. You’re arguing something I haven’t disputed. Their other efforts are a great start and better messaging.
That’s not really pertinent to my reply. Promoting clearing encampments isn’t an accurate representation of the efforts they’ve made to address the issue. I’m not contradicting those efforts, I’m demonstrating how promoting this action actually undermines those efforts.
TBF, time and time again, their base proves them right in that assessment.
🎯
Fact check: The overwhelming majority of the apprehensions and deportations by the regime have been non-criminal immigrants, who were following a “right way” path to citizenship.
Dear Delusional Diary…
Is that James Woods?
If you scream it while a monkey grinds its organ, it becomes true.
K
I’m following the same sources. That’s the point.
I don’t see Palestine protests nearly as frequently as I did before the election.
They’re certainly complicit.
I saw more before the election.
Where are all the protests?
I would absolutely love to be a fly on the wall when they discuss it amongst themselves.
substack.com/@shelbyraela...
He nails this.
I don’t know how she forms words around trump’s genitals in her mouth.
Is the media arguing that a police state is sustainable? Is that how desperate they’ve become? Also 36%? How many is that, 3?
If you listen very closely, you can hear Jill and Cornel spending all their Rubles.
No forgiveness for republican traitors. Not ever.
If children need protection from anyone, it’s republicans.
Shoot, who’s President now?
It’s not cool to misgender a transgender individual, even if they’re a mass shooter. JS.
That was one of my favorites, too.
For example: it’s widely accepted that he has criminal immunity, without an official ruling on the parameters of that immunity, that simply doesn’t exist in our Constitution. We shouldn’t just accept that as true.
I find heavy emphasis on “presumptive” in that statement. Thanks to the media and ineffective representation, I’ve noticed even the most tenacious of resisters drawing forgone conclusions regarding guidance from an illegitimate SCOTUS. If we have any hope to overcome, we have to remember our power.
We all know Trump’s strategy is to try and overwhelm people so they’ll unplug and he can complete his power grab. Here’s how to fight back. open.substack.com/pub/joycevan...
I say as long as he would take over after the midpoint, so he couldn’t run for two solid terms, I doubt he would be worse. Then again, I have as much idea of what his positions actually are, as he does.
The plancession becomes more evident by the day.
I get that you think I’m responsible for what it “looked like”(otherwise known as incompetently and defensively inferred), but if you refer to my OP, I asked about a single action. Once clarification had been made, people’s stubborn embarrassment took over. I’m not responsible for their illiteracy.
Sure, my point is explicitly about “clearing encampments”. Promoting that detracts from the efforts that have impact.
Oil barrons.
TF?
Dementia-con 1
Voter ID does nothing to secure elections. ID fraud is a thing.
Real talk.
It just feels like such a detracting thing to promote. They’ve made real efforts that should be exemplified instead. It’s such an odd messaging choice.
Release the Epstein files.
Dear childrapist-in-chief, How many people were victims of violence in Red states last week? Your fascism isn’t subtle. Sincerely, Patriots
Why don’t you send everyone proof of life first? (Either way, Chicago doesn’t want you here)
Yep. He’s an adjudicated seditionist. SCOTUS only ruled on if he could be removed from *primary* ballots. In the decision the Seditious Six said something about the penalty not being self executing, but the Amnesty Act contradicts that assessment.
There’s an episode where Julia went off about Clarence Thomas, and it’s truer than ever today.
Time for every ally of Denmark to sanction the US.
Now at the corner of K & 6th NE, massive ICE presence and arrest. Neighbors out in protest. (Reposted for correction.)
Still embarrassed, I see.
Again, only to the literate. There’s zero “research” involved in giving an observational critique on messaging. Which is all I did. Any inferences, by an unnecessarily defensive respondent, says more about them, than me. Read my OP again, if you’re still confused.
What do I need to research to make a critique on ineffective messaging, exactly? Please, be specific.
I can see why you chose to correct my spelling, rather than acknowledge this clarification. I’ll leave you with this: don’t invade someone’s mentions, to argue against something they haven’t said, then ignore their point, because you’re too embarrassed that you defensively inferred something.
Wow, it’s like you’ve never seen a typo before. Are you familiar with dyslexia? It turns my keyboard around. Now, do you want to stop attacking me with ad hominems and grammar evaluations, or would you like to acknowledge my actual point?
I’ve been saying this since it was announced. What is concerning, is that, somehow, trump improved his performance in nearly all Texas counties by roughly the same percentage over 2020. That, and given the number of registered Democrats in Texas, it’s a possibility their elections are compromised.
www.npr.org/2025/08/04/n...
Have you two tried addressing people who actually despute what Newsom’s done, rather than infer it and project on people who are just criticizing bad messaging, that doesn’t convey what they’ve done, and actually detracts from their achievements?
Agreed. A lot of people don’t seem to understand that its inclusion doesn’t convey effective solutions, and actually detracts from what they’re trying to promote.
It’s funny, because y’all are literally on my thread, willfully not understanding what I’m disputing.
Typos happen.
I’m literally disputing what’s conveyed by the verbiage. You clearly missed the point, even though I’ve repeatedly clarified. Please stay out of my mentions.
Here, let me tell you whats included when the term “clearing encampments” is used in messaging: CLEARING ENCAMPMENTS. Nothing else is implied by that. Please stay out of my mentions.
Again, you continue to incompetently infer that I need to be “educated”, from my *rhetorical* question. My dispute is *explicitly* with the inclusion of the term “clearing encampments”. It does not convey a solution. I’m sorry you don’t see how that’s bad messaging. Please get out of my mentions.
To illiterate people, who infer something I haven’t disputed, even after I’ve repeatedly clarified, sure.
You’ve irrelevantly listed several other impactful efforts that have been made. The physical act of “clearing encampments” doesn’t do anything to prevent homelessness. What don’t you comprehend about that fact?
What am I ignoring? You’re the one who refuses to focus on my point of contention. “Clearing encampments” is irrelevant to the work they’ve done.
What does that have to do with including “clearing encampments” in this promotion?
What research? I already know the actual efforts Newsome has made. That’s why “clearing encampments” is a stupid thing to promote, as it does nothing. What’s so hard for you to comprehend about that? I’m literally criticizing the messaging, not disputing anything they’ve done that actually helps.
You’re still not comprehending the point of my question. The act of “clearing encampments” does nothing to help the unhoused, and its inclusion in the post is taking the place of tangible efforts that actually help. Its bad messaging. I haven’t disputed the Governor’s actual efforts.
No it doesn’t. The efforts they’re actually taking do, though. Those efforts should be promoted, not something that doesn’t address the issue. It’s bad messaging.
Stop inferring that I need to research bad messaging. You’re missing the point.
What “article”? It’s a picture. It’s irrelevant to efforts that actually address homelessness, and it’s bad messaging. It was a rhetorical question. I’m not doing research. The reason I asked wasn’t because I don’t understand, it was to draw attention to its unnecessary inclusion.
You seem to not be able to comprehend the purpose of my question. “Clearing encampments” doesn’t support actually helping the unhoused and its inclusion in the post is irrelevant to the promotion of any tangible efforts and actions taken to help prevent or rectify homelessness. It’s bad messaging.