He has the right to his opinion without your extreme rudeness. You can't talk to people like that. His point is a legitimate one.
He has the right to his opinion without your extreme rudeness. You can't talk to people like that. His point is a legitimate one.
Science is against you on this question.
It's discrimination against women. You know, the part of the female category that never mattered to people like you. All women are discriminated against when males enter their category.
No, you are unwell. Deeply unwell and anti-social.
It was the FA of times, it was the FO of times. Write that over an entire nation, and nature will start healing.
Whereas I'm generally pretty freaked out by American standards! I've been spared a fear of runny eggs, *for the time being*. There's no limit to what horrors they'll invent for us next. But I'm not there anymore, with no eye to return.
I'm an atheist. I don't believe in the miracle of transubstantiation. People don't magically change sexes after whatever trauma induced them to be that uncomfortable in the skin they're in. Thanks for proving my point. This batshittery is also regressive, misogynistic nonsense, and it needs to stop.
I don't live in Canada, so I'm relying on your Ontario egg producers to inform me, and they're saying this. You may just have a lot of smaller farms around you, and I think that's great. Always better quality at smaller scale. I'm not against you. Apparently, though, egg washing is a standard.
The "birthing people" advocates have arrived in the chat to impose this language on us all, including the politicians, as if by clockwork. My point has been made! 🥳
I don't mean to keep contradicting you, but I looked all this up yesterday as an open question, and the answers I got don't say what you've said. Why do Canadians refrigerate eggs? - Get Cracking share.google/a5fdY9JnGhxL...
Look at the stats on sexual predation. Which sex? Doesn't matter which political party, which race, which class, which religion. It's men.
In the US, local, small farms don't have to. May be the same in Canada. Eggs are not washed in France at all, which is why they can be stored at room temperature. Washing removes the biofilm that protects against disease. It's done because it also removes pathogens on the outside and feces.
Exactly
When there are salmonella outbreaks in Canada, it is recommended to cook them all the way through. Maybe your friend experienced something like that in the US, but again, it's uncommon. Some countries vaccinate the chickens. Seems like the way to go. I'm not trying to be difficult. Just searching.
You're speaking about pasteurized eggs. In Canada too, those are the surest bet against any food-borne illness. But they are uncommon and mostly unnecessary. We have higher rates of salmonella than Canada. But it's still pretty unusual. Both countries wash the eggs so they have to be refrigerated.
I don't think this is real. I've lived all over the United States. What do you mean by room temperature eggs? I've never had to take a single precaution of the sort. We eat runny eggs routinely, and this is just not an issue.
For you.
You must struggle with it.
You're rewriting history. This language has absolutely been part of radical trans activism's demands. I'm a woman on the left, and it has been a real problem. There has been erasure of women's sex-based rights and language. Stop throwing women and girls under the bus.
Bigoted against MAGA? Is that a protected class?
They're still evil. And what they've brought about is pure evil. There's no excuse. They're bad people. I know them, too. They're not good people. I don't care how nice they are to YOU. They want this for others, and that's makes them Hannah Arendt evil.
I believe the first part, but the second part? Where? Eggs that make you sick if you don't cook them all the way through? That's not true.
Yes
I'm afraid to ask this question, but why don't they?
No, not the only ones. The more dangerous threat, but not the only. You clearly specialize in having only a partial clue. Take several seats.
There's another meme that applies here: "Trust me, bro." I'm just supposed to believe any organization calling itself non-partisan and using an opaque method with results that contradict other, more direct data sets? Show us the work. Again, I WANT this to be true.
Yes, what was the method? Where do the numbers come from? The only explanation given is that they seem to have made assumptions based on race. But what were the original numbers? How were these assumptions made? I'd really like to make the argument in question, but I need more proof.
It doesn't explain how the modeling analytics are performed, actually. We are unable to scrutinize the method. Also, voting in a primary isn't evidence of party affiliation. Americans often try to wreck outcomes by voting in primaries for parties they don't support. I want to support this btw.
I don't need to settle down, and I wasn't saying that to you.
Spray Feliway on the couch. Scratching is more than a claw maintenance issue. It's a marking behavior. Feliway has cat pheromones and is odorless and colorless (also has bonus cat relaxation effects). The cat thinks the territory is already marked and leaves your furniture alone. Declawing is abuse.
So you're not going to tell us? I have to go through an entire organization's website to try to understand what you're saying? We're asking you to explain, not to be arrogant. But do you.
Ah, Schwarzenegger?
Not the leader we deserve, but the psychopath we need?
Yeah, dumb it down for all of us, because I don't want to be spreading lies. I work with psychological studies, and sampling in that field doesn't work at all the way you just said. These two sets of numbers are incompatible.
Won't I generate income for her if I watch those?
What have you heard her say?
Fascism is direct control of the government by the owning class. Slavery is the most lucrative means of extracting labor. Before they were death camps, they were work camps. When they said Latino immigrants were stealing black people's jobs, I thought they meant to put black people in the fields.
Being a woman who cares about women's rights, your life story is watching other women sell out women. Not consolation but commiseration. I've always admired the greater solidarity in the black community.
I don't feel like I know enough about her. I thought the far right thing was a smear? In Australia, it doesn't appear those women invited the far right so much as their event was crashed by them. Both forces are violently anti-woman.
Women and girls aren't an acceptable sacrifice, though. Our rights and opportunities do matter. What's happening throughout the nation is very wrong. But trampling on our sex-based rights isn't right.
Women and girls deserve sporting opportunities as a protected sex class.
You kind of have to be like that when you're full of shit and don't know what you're doing. Anything can topple the house of cards; best not to disturb it. Dogmatism is the refuge of the simpleminded, when politics becomes religion. They remind one of fanatics sitting in windows, judging neighbors.
It's middle class moralism, a version of politics that has little in common with actual Marxism. I associate it with middle class radicalism, in a political sense, which to me is the left spectrum of liberalism. But illiberal in that dissent and a struggle over ideas are anathema, suspect even.
If there's a strain of leftism it reminds me of, it would be Maoism, which is nevertheless a very middle class politics. It smacks of struggle sessions and the like, sudden reversals and declarations of political degeneracy for minimal slights. Charlatanry passed off as expertise. Not proletarian.
Wannabe is the operative word. They pretend to be something that is wholly in opposition to what they're doing. It became fashionable to cosplay being a Marxist, but these people have strictly no idea what that means. They're happy to bastardize civil rights and revolutionary politics alike.
I would argue it isn't left at all. It's postmodern hyperindividualism, which is hostile to leftist politics but fits nicely with neoliberalism. It's fake progressive, and it has captured a lot of people because there's tons of sexism on the left. Nobody is immune from the conditioning.
Anyway, I'm not responding to a Czech troll.
How dare you. Driving people out of politics is the work of politicians, their lackeys and apologists. When people disconnect in disgust, that's on all of you. It's more honest to disengage from a shit show. At that point, they're not paying attention anymore. You offered them nothing of value.
These are some abysmally overweight LE.
You must really like losing to fascists. Because this is exactly how you lost and will keep losing. It is NEVER the fault of people who have been turned off politics by a corrupt system. It's your fault for not offering something more meaningful to them. You're blaming them for your failure. Yours.
You and your movement are responsible for the ills wrought. As for simple peeing, that old canard, bathroom rapes of women and girls occur disproportionately in mixed sex spaces, which you aim to normalize. Yours is a misogynistic movement that harms us in myriad ways.
It doesn't hold. The arguments are neither scientific, nor philosophically or politically sound. It's a castle made of sand. Let people dress how they want. They are not materially what they claim to be simply because they wish it so. Women exist as a sex class. You don't opt in on feels.
It had to cost the political class a lot first. That's my read from afar.
A lot of them are deluding themselves. Some of them benefit financially. But most are following marching orders without seriously thinking.
I don't think we can have a proper conversation here. I know that I started out an early supporter of this movement for probably many of the same reasons as you. But it embraces predators and it does not care about women. Hard line for me, because sex and biology and women's oppression matter.
Any woman who has ever cared about sexism has had to face early on how very many women will sell out other women to curry the favor of powerful men.
I think you believe you're doing the right thing, and I applaud you for that. I think you're misled and mistaken. I also stand up for what's right. No one cares about women. Women are an afterthought to this movement, a mere costume.
Likewise!
I see two men telling a woman how to feel about the colonization of her sex and the endangerment of her fellows. I supported this movement until I saw its open misogyny. You think you're being progressive, but you're not.
There's not a single insult in what I said. If you read one, that's a You issue. I defended you from being called a misogynist, though. I deal in reality. I like living there.
What insult?
Women are not allowed to have boundaries. The female facilitators of it are some of the worst.
The other day someone said one would never go to such lengths to transition for bad reasons, as it's too hard and expensive. Yet sex offenders discover their female identity in prison and obtain access to free hormones and women's prison cells. Women are collateral damage for men's fantasies.
No, because misogyny is the air we breathe, so it is seen not to exist at all.
It never happens, you see, because there is a halo floating above the head of every biological male who fancies himself a woman. All innocent. All free of sin or blame. Sounds like Catholic priests 2.0. The sacred cow, where abusers hide in plain sight.
You don't actually believe that tw are w or tm are m. You don't, and the sports thing proves it. Just step away from the fantasy, because it hasn't done the progressive cause any good to embrace batshittery. We all have eyes. We all know.
Stronger than when you used it against him, because it's the truth. Women are nothing and no one to you. You're a male supremacist.
Women are the slaves of the world. Our oppression never matters. This is a men's rights movement. That became clear very early on, and I was a supporter at first.
You're the misogynist here.
There's a difference between stereotyping all abusers as being a particular race and recognizing those girls were let down because they were poor and that they were indeed targeted because they were white. It's a messy reality that wasn't handled well by so-called progressives. Nuance is necessary.
Wrong measure. Can black people associate alone in private without whites? I would argue, yes. We sex segregate because biological males are dangerous, and they're particularly dangerous to women. It's women who need protecting.
You don't get to decide on behalf of all others. A lot of women also live in a state of dissociation about the harms until it happens to them. Biological males have the same rates of harm against women regardless of gender identity. That's what matters.
A trans woman IS a biological male. And don't tell women and girls what we have to do differently in order to accommodate the creepiness you endorse.
The store said it wasn't his job, so now what? Why are you defending what his employer said he wasn't supposed to be doing? Surely you have SOME experience of predatory males, and surely you under this is exactly what they do when they're pushing the envelope. You're not so obtuse as you let on.
The delulu is dangerous.
I don't think you can, actually
You know you're a liar, and so do we. We all understand what your goal is.
You are a misogynist. We can surmise a lot about how you view and treat women from your comments.
🙄
Women and girls, children more generally, never seem to matter to people like you. The experience of the biological female is erased. Here's a simple sentence for you: NO.
Charming
This is not an "utterly vile" joke. It's pertinent and well-earned satire.
Absolutely no excuse ffs
Neither Lenin nor Trotsky said those things. Weird that you attribute what I said to a need for intellectual superiority rather than what I said and what it is, a desire for accuracy. But you do you. I'll be taking my leave.
I question how blind some of them are. This kind of lack of empathy isn't accidental. The women are often blinded. They dissociate from their reality as women. But the activists who railroad in these areas do not consider women people; I'm convinced of it.
That's exactly the argument. What's a little more cruel and unusual punishment where we're concerned? Misogynists pretending to be righteous. The new era of woman hate.
From where? Your quote is from the New Testament, Paul the Apostle, Thessalonians. And it is counter to socialist ideas, textually. "From each according to his ability; to each according to his needs" is the Marxist principle. It's important to be intellectually accurate.
I think they mean something potentially more sinister.
The statistics come from the UK, Canadian and American state governments. You aren't trying to learn, and I'm not being unfair. You simply don't care about biological women. We are easy sacrifices for the right and neoliberal hyperindividualists. Misogyny is both a right and left problem.
This is incorrect and is a common claim to deny and cover up the problem while not caring at all about biological women, empathy for whom is wholly lacking for people with a purely identitarian agenda. The data differentiate. We are not speaking about sex work but sexual predation.
I have to go, but I invite you to invest more empathy into the lives and safety of incarcerated women. 84% have already been victims of sexual assault. It tends to inform how women end up in prison, albeit mostly for non-violent crimes. They don't deserve additional trauma to validate an identity.
That's not the reality. Doesn't matter what the numbers are. One dangerous biological male can terrorize an entire women's prison. No amount of collateral damage is ok. The same argument is used in sports. So few. Yes, and a lot of women being discriminated against.
But what women know and what society generally knows - what you know - is that males with these offending patterns are dangerous and typically escalate their behaviors. Access to a women's prison would not be benign. Yet the trans movement pretends it isn't happening and fights for these policies.
Take this person as an example. Presume they're initially sent to a men's prison (could immediately be a women's prison, but let's pretend). There, Abby gets free access to hormones and takes them, demands access to the women's prison, and is granted it. Your standard presumes innocent intent.
You don't know what motivates all people. The statistics don't lie. Trans women retain male patterns of offending. There are rights to be balanced. We sex segregate because biological males primarily target biological women and are more capable and likely to do physical harm. It's that simple.
I'm talking about the US. But this was previously also the policy in the UK. It resulted in rapes and other harm against women before an outcry stopped it. The trans movement has largely ignored or denied the existence of opportunistic harm against women and children under its umbrella.
Untrue. You need to look into this more. And also, biological males harm women at the same rates regardless of gender identity. And according to prison statistics, self-identified trans women in prison are more likely to be there for violent sexual offenses. We must care about women's safety.
Do you think they meant voluntarily?
Funny how you ignored the rest. Bye now.