The combust myth is nonsense. No Musk fan however EVs, including Teslas hardly ever actually burn. ICE vehicles burn at a rate of 1500 per yr, per 100K made. EVs: 25. BTW hybrids: 3500 per yr. Just stop. FSD is dangerous & shouldn't be trusted.
The combust myth is nonsense. No Musk fan however EVs, including Teslas hardly ever actually burn. ICE vehicles burn at a rate of 1500 per yr, per 100K made. EVs: 25. BTW hybrids: 3500 per yr. Just stop. FSD is dangerous & shouldn't be trusted.
Musk is dangerous and shouldn't be trusted His cars have a propensity towards spontaneous combustion you can't hide that
Musk is dangerous is an accurate statement. Musk shouldn't be trusted is an accurate statement. Using the word propensity to describe any EV related to thermal runaway is incorrect unless the EV is sitting in a flood containing salt water. That's my point. EV fires are rare.
This is just not true.
Bwahahahahahahaha Tesla's are known for their thermal runaway
All EVs are because it does happen, and is extremely rare. Early Bolts had defective batteries and early Model S had insufficient shielding under the battery so road debris could damage it. Both problems are fixed. Guess data isn't relevant when you don't want it.