avatar
Mxnsab @mxnsab.bsky.social

What about trumps transphobic policies? Why are those fine to you? Would you vote to be the Omelas kid?

aug 30, 2025, 2:12 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
bladenp.bsky.social @bladenp.bsky.social

His policies aren’t fine. That’s why I wonder why anyone who supports Trans rights would ever take actions that help all of them continue.

aug 30, 2025, 2:24 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Mxnsab @mxnsab.bsky.social

We aren't the ones saying "all but his transphobia" sweetie. That is you.

aug 30, 2025, 2:26 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
bladenp.bsky.social @bladenp.bsky.social

No. I meant all of Trump’s transphobia policies. Newsom would be fine with trans people serving in the military. He signed laws protecting trans privacy. He wouldn’t deny Trans people passports unless they’re deadnamed, or force trans people to serve in the wrong prisons or deny them healthcare.

aug 30, 2025, 2:29 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Mxnsab @mxnsab.bsky.social

He is already denying people healthcare though. Like do you think he hasn't done anything in regards to trans people since 2023?

aug 30, 2025, 2:32 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
bladenp.bsky.social @bladenp.bsky.social

Are you referring to his difficult budget cutting decisions? Every other group that suffered cuts is also bitching about how he has abandoned them.

aug 30, 2025, 2:36 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Mxnsab @mxnsab.bsky.social

This isn't about budget cutting. This one stops the ability to care for the trans youth fleeing transphobic states. www.eqca.org/vetoes-gende...

aug 30, 2025, 2:39 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Mxnsab @mxnsab.bsky.social

Here he vetoed a bill that would protect trans children in divorce proceeding from forcing them to live with transphobic parents edsource.org/updates/news...

aug 30, 2025, 2:40 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
bladenp.bsky.social @bladenp.bsky.social

And you ignored all the other pro Trans bills he signed in the same session.

aug 30, 2025, 3:12 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
bladenp.bsky.social @bladenp.bsky.social

Because it’s already a requirement under CA law to take the health safety and welfare of the child into consideration when determining custody. It also sets a bad precedent that we are now going to dictate parental fitness based upon religious or political beliefs.

aug 30, 2025, 3:11 pm • 0 0 • view