It’s hard to predict what an objectively pro-autocracy SCOTUS that’s run to the right of Anthonin Scalia on gun laws might consider constitutional. What do you think the words “well-regulated” probably meant in the 1700s?

Keeping your powder dry, skills up, weapons functioning in it’s more basic form

Who gets to assess militia members’ successful regulation?

The states as the amendment clearly sets limits of the federal governments power

Yes, the states are permitted to infringe the weapons rights of poorly regulated militia members. Thanks very much.

I’m sure you think that. Unfortunately the words in the constitution don’t support your opinion.

You just agreed to every step of the required logic, so

Hey real quick, seeing as you’re a student of the text: when does the constitution say the president is allowed take bribes?

Since I know you’ll never admit the gaping chasm of your textual hypocrisy, enjoy this screenshot as a receipt of your rhetorical pratfall:

Learn what infringement means you misused it Thats the problem you can’t seem to understand The public education system failed you