avatar
Robert Brydon @robertbrydon.bsky.social

I apologize for the misunderstanding. I am not defending the uses of this tech or the companies. I am stating that this kind of requirement cannot be implemented at 100% accuracy on LLM technology (and if it could be, the same breakthroughs would make the technology far more useful).

aug 28, 2025, 5:34 am • 1 0

Replies

avatar
O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ @odetteroulette.bsky.social

Apology accepted. I know I come across very strongly abt this but it's because I'm seeing harm to thinking processes of humans in real time. It doesn't need to be 100% accurate because nothing is. I don't think this particular technology will ever be more useful.

aug 28, 2025, 5:37 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ @odetteroulette.bsky.social

The truth is, it needs human experts checking it. And it probably always will.

aug 28, 2025, 5:39 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Robert Brydon @robertbrydon.bsky.social

Yep. That and things where a moderate rate of errors is totally okay. But things that need expert review, or are low stakes are... well, they already work well enough and don't allow the promise of "we will disrupt this 4 Billion dollar industry and allow you to lay off 75% of your staff".

aug 28, 2025, 5:49 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Robert Brydon @robertbrydon.bsky.social

TL;DR: I don't think there is a technical solution that would add the kind of guardrails needed to a product that is trying to sell the illusion of an intelligent, reasoning, knowledgeable machine. And late stage capitalism is the reason why people are trying to sell that illusion.

aug 28, 2025, 5:51 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ @odetteroulette.bsky.social

Well that also needs regulation. Basically, everything humans create needs regulating in order to prevent misuse or corruption.

aug 28, 2025, 5:53 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Robert Brydon @robertbrydon.bsky.social

I think that this current type of "Generative AI" as they currently exist have some useful cases, but those are ones that broadly were working before we started throwing the power consumption of medium sized nations to eke out minimal improvements. But what is drawing investment is mostly total BS.

aug 28, 2025, 5:43 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Robert Brydon @robertbrydon.bsky.social

If you think "AI" chat programs should be banned if they can't do this, you think all currently "AI" chat programs should be de facto banned. And like, I'm not going to argue against that. From my non-expert understanding of the law, that's an abstract moral debate, not a practical one.

aug 28, 2025, 5:37 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ @odetteroulette.bsky.social

No, I think they shld be curtailed strongly. And fact checked. And given limitations. Also, until a better way is created, their environmental cost is too high. Will it happen? Not until we get legislation. In the meantime, it'll go to court.

aug 28, 2025, 5:40 am • 0 0 • view