So you admit it would be good if Starmer and Lammy were sent to the Hague. Got it.

Like ANY prosocution, it should be decided by the law and the decision it is in the public interest. Do I think it's a good idea to be clamouring from the sidelines for the sitting PM to be prosecuted, no, I think you should have nuance in your discussion of culpability for the crime of GENOCIDE.

Man's out here asking for a "nuanced" discussion of the holocaust. [David Irving klaxon]

Aye, sorry if it's a bit of a challenge for your B&W thinkin

Genocide or not is very black and white thinking. There is no grey area. Those who support it and receive donations from the perpetrators are complicit and should be tried. You are a flying monkey for fascists.

To be fair, if Starmer were in the street beheading kittens, these melts would be lining up to say that it's the kittens fault. Anything bad is excusable if it's done with a red tie.

And yet WE are the 'cultists'...

They can recognise that it's bad when Russia does it, but not when Israel does it. That's when people show you they're fed by propaganda, not facts. Ironic though, claiming to be a free thinker when you're basically repeating what Western governments tell you...

The 'poor, misunderstood, aggressively misreported government that really is doing good stuff honest! Just ignore the anti immigrant rabble rousing and genocide or we'll end up with fartrage!'

So in your view "the holocaust" is a bit of a grey area. I see.

When it's in defence of a grey man, no depth of depravity is off the table, clearly.