Wow. Ok. Thats a lot to unpack and discuss. Where would you like to begin?
Wow. Ok. Thats a lot to unpack and discuss. Where would you like to begin?
Not a lot to unpack. TDS research is usually impeccable. Tonight's take down of corporate "pre-compliance" vintage. Taking down corporate pre-compliance then having a guest who arguably did same by pulling 2024 prez endorsement and not touching on it? Ironic. And a miss. Just thought worth a note.
I read the article I rewatched the episode I re-read what you said You’re right. It’s worth a note.
Appreciate your taking a second look. FYI - You may recall that Washington Post, owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, took a similar tack with its 2024 prez endorsement. Hang in there. "'Washington Post' won't endorse in White House race for first time since 1980s" www.npr.org/2024/10/25/n...
The unpacking is the discussion about why/if news organizations should endorse or not is what I was referring to. I see both sides of the argument. I’d like to discuss more in detail. 1. Are we angry newspapers aren’t endorsing candidates? 2. Why? 3. Is it reported news or reported bias?