I don’t know how many EU citizens left UK after Brexit, but it’s a substantial number. We (EUinUK) predicted this would happen. This kind of vindication does not feel like a triumph though.
I don’t know how many EU citizens left UK after Brexit, but it’s a substantial number. We (EUinUK) predicted this would happen. This kind of vindication does not feel like a triumph though.
Why doesn't the Labour Party simply point out this fact and say it was a good thing?
Which does beg the question as to why Starmer won't confront the chief architect of the chaos with this. Hang the failure of Brexit & the lack of coherent plan to implement it around Farage's neck & point out that the charlatan is doing the same thing again. He needs to be braver!
Starmer was the architect of the second referendum option & got badly burned. Brexit in one sense achieved the goal of its voters: reduced EU immigration. Events since prove it was always the politicians that refused to control it. It would be political death for Starmer to fall in to this camp.
I'd counter that his current reticence & silence at Farage's wild pronouncements over deportation (unchallenged by virtually everyone in the media) has already put him in danger of political death. He appears to be a little too focused on world, rather than domestic, affairs
Tbh, like most PMs, I suspect he finds world affairs simply much easier to deal with than the most intractable parts of domestic politics.
To what extent are these figures separate from people who came under the settle status schemes? Those had greater than expected numbers
They didn't arrive between 2021-2024 though, most people eligible for the EUSS arrived before 31 December 2020.
True but the EUSS may be the first time they were counted
Here in EU under FOM people are counted through registration with IDs so councils & govts can be informed & plan ahead for services. Maybe this is the real control that the British lack? (Failure to register=no healthcare, education, accommodation, services etc.)
And the really unacceptable thing about that is not the immigration policy itself (although it is a very extreme one, as you say) but that they simultaneously said that immigration was bad and they were cracking down on it. Together this has created an insanely disoriented public mood on this.
(The fact that the British government could run this policy with that rhetoric suggests things about the corruption and stupidity of the UK discourse that I don't want to think about).
The tories did not loose control. Increased migration was a plan to hide the costs of Brexit and to offset EU nationals leaving. Planned higher immigration meant GDP growth did not go to zero or below zero.
Quite. That was my point, and one which comes across clearly from the WSJ’s excellent reporting
Sorry, I read the article snapshot and not all of your post. Increased immigration is probably the reason my Tesco shares have doubled in value, but my shares in engineering/ tech companies trading across Europe have struggled.
Dassault Systèmes share price also doubled over 9 years. You could have invested in ASML Holdings NV or Vestas Wind Systems AS.
📌
OK ….UK gov built an economy based on services and consumer capitalism . Cheap food , hospitality, cheap imported goods , distribution centres , all of which needed an increased labour force , cheap cash . Actively recruit overseas labour to grow economy . Pre Brexit .
This is the disaster at the heart of GB's economic failure: gdp growth by population boosting while wages and gdp per capita stagnate (a pre-Bexit phenomenon). Reversing it first and foremost requires ending the source of cheap labour, which voters have figured out.
📌
what do you mean "inflicted on Britain"? Are you against immigrants and if so why?
Not read this piece yet, but it's the second time someone's posted that "1 in every 25" number and I don't see how that can be right? 4.5m times either 25 or 24 (whichever way you're meant to do it) makes 108-112.5m people? That's about 40m too many I think
Presumably half the 4.5m have left already (as you would expect since the numbers measure arrivals, regardless of how long they plan to stay). Otherwise it would be 1 in 15 people which would surely be far too high…
Ah right - yes if I do it the other way around then 1/25 of ~71m is about 2.8m... Still not sure what that means. I'll have to read the piece
And do please come back and explain it to the arithmetically-challenged (me)
It’s simply saying that of the 4.5 million who arrived during the last four years of the Tories, more than half are still here. As a result, one in 25 people in the country today arrived during those years…
That's how I first read it, then confused myself. Thanks for clarifying. That's an impressive statistic.
The Tory refusal to be honest about the scale of their Brexit disaster and associated trade-offs has utterly discredited the party, perhaps permanently, radicalised the right and raised the spectre of a Faragist Trumpian tyranny. The country risks being trapped in a doom loop.
We have to learn from the experience of Johnson as PM. Initially they appear charismatic but fragile egos need to strut, need self aggrandisement, need revenge, they are grandiose, have no emotional intelligence or empathy, no interest in needs of electorate. Narcissists are toxic in public office.
But it was FARAGE's Brexit disaster too - and now those deluded Brexit voters see him as the firebrigade rather than the bloody Arsonist he is!!!
...and we have to listen to and read the same dishonesty as they prepare the country for more of the same shite. This time, with King Charlatan front and centre and The Labour Party hiding behind him.
All to stop people "banging on about Europe" in the Tory Party.