avatar
Anguirus @anguirus.bsky.social

I’m all for a contrarian, bare-knuckle take on DS9, but that’s just ridiculous bad faith out of the gate In a broader sense, a lot of commentators on TV/film don’t seem to accept that acting has styles at all

sep 1, 2025, 10:44 pm • 2 0

Replies

avatar
Liz @lizbarr.bsky.social

I am always happy to come in and argue that DS9 is more conservative/neoliberal than its fans give credit for, and its (deserved) reputation as The Best Trek means its faults go unexamined. But there is not a single bad actor in the entire show. Except maybe the dude who played Bareil.

sep 1, 2025, 10:56 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Anguirus @anguirus.bsky.social

Yeah…I wish somehow they’d kept Li Nalas around instead of the Bareil/ Shakaar “let’s check in on Bajor” dude

sep 1, 2025, 11:00 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Liz @lizbarr.bsky.social

Absolutely! But also I think there was a problem with a LOT of Trek of that era where a male love interest for a female character was always conceived as a soft-spoken, milquetoasty non-threatening boy.

sep 1, 2025, 11:02 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Anguirus @anguirus.bsky.social

Thinking back to this era of the franchise / life, I wonder if that’s why Paris / Torres felt so refreshing They just ground their gears on each other, it really wasn’t anything special but the bar was low

sep 1, 2025, 11:05 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Liz @lizbarr.bsky.social

I think that's absolutely it! They were introduced as characters first and evolved into a romantic couple organically. (So did Janeway and Chakotay, to a point, but Jeri Taylor had some very particular ideas about romance that got caught up in the mix.)

sep 1, 2025, 11:09 pm • 1 0 • view