I don’t think it’s 100% clear. There could be an exception from an underwriter for a political figure who is required to have 2 homes to do their job. Until we see her complete loan file we don’t know. I have family that own a mortgage company.
I don’t think it’s 100% clear. There could be an exception from an underwriter for a political figure who is required to have 2 homes to do their job. Until we see her complete loan file we don’t know. I have family that own a mortgage company.
Lisa Cook is not a politician. And even if she were, there is no exception for any profession, but active duty military who are unable to occupy their home due to a deployment. By definition, one can only have one “primary residence”.
additional q - do you support an investigation of Paxton?
I support investigating anyone if there is credible evidence of wrongdoing. I haven’t follow it closely, but Paxton has committed a crime, he should be prosecuted.
And if there were some sort of politician exception, then Adam Schiff and Leticia James wouldn’t be under investigation. Schiff, James and Cook are highly educated, knowledgeable and sophisticated people. They each knew exactly what they were doing.
Schiff and James are under investigation because Trump is a petty little child. you are treating 'investigation' as sufficient proof of guilt, a perfectly authoritarian view
Do you think Schiff and James should be allowed to defraud a mortgage company because Trump is mad at them?
No Do you think DOJ should launch 'investigations' and people should assume guilt just because Trump is mad at someone?
The accusations didn’t come from Trump. They came from Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte. He has seen the evidence, much of which has been shared with the media. No one is above the law.
now answer my question, son
I don’t accept your premise, dick.
indeed, you can't cope with criticism of dear leader
Pulte is a partisan hack. He's already lied multiple times, and points to things that don't show what he claims they show. the idea that Pulte isn't just doing Trump's bidding is incredibly naive
The mortgage applications exist. If they committed fraud, they should be prosecuted. The motivation is not relevant. Tish James campaigned on find something for which to prosecute Trump. She overstepped and her case fell apart. If there’s nothing to these allegations then Trump will be
her case did not, in fact, fall apart
properly vilified. But if they are accurate, do you think they should get a pass?
he may be properly vilified, but people like you will continue on parroting his bullshit I already said they shouldn't get a pass. meanwhile you are over here repeating that Trump should have gotten a pass for his misconduct
Again, until we see line and verse PROOF of what any of these people are accused of, it’s speculation. Given the source of the claims (a convicted felon) I call bullshit until PROOF otherwise. The irony…
This is the part where you block me because I made you look stupid. “A CNN review of mortgage documents shows that Cook did take out mortgages for two properties, both of which were listed as her principal residence.” amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/08/...
they aren't the one who looks stupid here