k show me the article where he says that. Then if he is in possession of documents that in itself is a crime. As he was not president when he obtained them.
k show me the article where he says that. Then if he is in possession of documents that in itself is a crime. As he was not president when he obtained them.
First show me what federal law says that possession without willful intent is a crime. 👇
uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?r...
That proves what I said.
possession on its own is a crime as the law there says. You can dodge all you want. Possession by itself it says is a crime.
It plainly says "with the intent to retain such documents". So no, possession alone is not a crime. bsky.app/profile/mj24...
it doesnt say that intent is also a requirement. It says and not must also have intent. Besides what was his intent if not to retain the documents? nice try, youre reaching pal.
Yes, it says "and", meaning BOTH. 🤦 It allows for unintentional retention.
how would you determine it was unintentional? you know this how. haha good luck with that. And as long as it mentions possession is against the law it's still illegal. It doesn't specifically say it has to be both. This is why it would need to be ruled on by a judge and it hasn't yet.
With an investigation!!!! Which is what they did in both cases! Of Biden & Trump, only Trump lied five times and hid documents! IT SAYS IT HAS TO BE BOTH THAT IS WHAT "AND" MEANS. 🤦
We know for a fact that Trump used Nauta and DeOlivera to hide documents from the FBI based on photos, witnesses, and texts. We don't have to wonder about intent.
It's not Biden's fault the GOP picked Hur to investigate Biden.