Proud Israeli American dual citizenship. Merica. People have way too much time on their hands to be so hateful. All you need is love and passion
6 followers 1 following 963 posts
view profile on Bluesky
We just have different logic. We both take facts and formulate our own opinions. I believe the conviction against Trump is corrupt. I think a mislabeling of 34 checks as campaign expense, is not a serious infraction to me. it doesnt matter to me in choosing a president. You disagree for your reasons
if you are offended by that I will gladly stop. The people on Blue sky are very petty and try to block and then report claiming I offended them. there attempt to get people banned are really pathetic
I would love to see your proof of this. Biden had a harassment claim from a former staffer as well. Sorry pal they all are scumbags. Would you like to talk about Clintons indiscretions?
sure pal. Trump derangement syndrome, endless lawsuits and attacks, Trump is the most popular thing on the media; Sure no one wants to slander Trump just before the election. don t make me laugh dude. believe what you want. Either way, it didnt work he won its over.
haha not according to the result of the lawsuit. Trump won. sorry
facts of the case appear to be unusual and open to an appeal. Facts: the judges unusual instructions to the jury, judge restricts the election law witness, AG makes the stretch to a felony. All points to argue in an appeal
we dont have a media. We have an independent movement of pod casters and reporters not controlled by mass media and there powerful owners. All of us could see it was an attempt to sway the public from Trump by getting a conviction at any cost, even if it is turned over on appeal. And it didnt work
yea the Deranged Neve Trumper up top blocked me and is probably claiming to blue sky I offended him. so now is a good time for disclaimer. All of you are really sad you try to get people banned on blue sky out of spite
is 77 million more than 75 million? we call that the majority. AKA winning the popular vote.
you can blame the previous guy all you want, come Election Day you and you alone responsible for your 4 years.
absolutely 24 FBI assets is completely innocent. Video of Ray Epps totally innocent. Nothing going on im sure
objective truth that a biased judge, prosecutor convicted Trump. Yes I agree. Also objective truth that the voters didnt care because we saw it for what it was.
law abiding Americans? lol put you under a microscope and we'd find something. Dont make me laugh. Careful now you wouldn't want to get sued for millions like ABC and George Stephonopolus for wrongfully accusing him of rape. Oh that was glorious watching Trump win that www.bbc.com/news/article...
rapist-unproven, racist-unproven. Yea the electoral college is always broken when your guy doesnt win. sure. is 77 million more than 75 million. we call that a majority. Stephen A said it best, "when 80% of traditionally left counties switch to the right, THATS A MANDATE" lol
www.pewresearch.org/politics/202...
he definitely needs to do more for economy. Things are trending better. luckily he's only been in for 6 months. you can't score a presidency after 6 months. I think you Cancer candidate voters have no room to criticize. Bidens approval rating after 4 years was in the 30s same as Trump.
Stretching it to a felony, restricting witnesses testimony, unusual jury instructions: all possible points to overturn on appeal. We'll see what happens. The judge apparently didn't believe in the case enough to sentence him to any punishment.
according to you I dont have the facts. but I dont agree with that statement. I like my facts just fine. I like the opinions of Alan Dershowitz and Megan Kelly. That it will most likely be overturned on appeal
likewise. You have your preferred narrative. You're right myself and 77 million other Americans voted we dont' agree and re elected the convicted felon. Loving every minute of it too. Oh yea such a heinous financial crime he committed too. (sarcasm)
oh no whatever will we do. Grow up.
un ethical perhaps. illegal no. Hasn't been proven illegal in court.
So in the case of this conversation yes on Election Day the majority AKA the popular vote agreed with Trump.
haha your grasp voting is funny. Yea not impressed with Blue Sky acumen as of yet. of the population that voted (which is the only one that matters) yea it is the majority. Of the other 100 million eligible age voters who didn't vote, you can only speculate what their vote would be.
So youre saying 24 FBI assets weren't in the crowd? Including Ray Epps who can be seen on video inciting the crowd to violence.
Yea I don't agree that they were impartial or unbiased. I don't agree with the commutations for violent offenders. But I really dont give a shit. Bowser and Pelosi made their bed refusing the National guard. And if you say there was no foul play with FBI assets in the crowd, I call you a liar
what evidence do you have that they meet the definition of concentration camp? To me there are 200 of these immigrant detention facilities around the country since the days of Bush jr. Nothing wrong with them. and if there is anything improper about their deportation they can bring it out in court.
yea because he claims that as president he was permitted to. He never had his day in court to prove it. Every president since Reagan has willfully retained documents. It turns out vice presidents and congressmen have too. This is why it's ridiculous. No one ever prosecuted someone over it.
So Trump isn't president and the people actually cared that he was convicted of a flimsy financial crime? Did I miss something. Im saying that a conviction and all of the corrupt law fare they threw at Trump didnt sway the peoples vote liked they hoped it would. Because they saw it for what it was
yet another example of the result of our debate....we dont agree. You think I showed nothing but I can go back and see the articles I posted, you think I got corrected but I disagree. So dont worry your pretty head. I disagree. stop trying so hard. It's over. Trump won and we're loving it
sorry pal I can't help you with your derangement anymore. Try and find some real meaning life. So go thou and sin no more. 🖕
haha. sorry not an adjudicated rapist. Sexual misconduct actually in civil court. The accusation didnt meet the burden of proof for criminal trial. And this is why you people lost and he won. I quote Megan Kelly " I dont give a shit, if he was handsy with a woman in Bergdorfs dressing room"
blah blah. blah youre boring I would debate you that the cost of living under Trumps first term was what the people want and not Bidens disaster but you accept nothing. we've gone around all these subject already. You have your opinion and I mine. Mine got elected however. good luck with that ✌️
hey as long as there are two judges that found the reports credible enough, thats good enough for me. You guys can tell yourselves whatever you want it won't matter when they deport him.
ya know I hear that he someone an actually mean it was MS13 on his knuckles and not mean it in the literal sense. That thats wha the tattoo means. It's another "all Mexicans are murderers and rapists" narrative you guys are pushing. I get it. Good of you. You go girl
good for you. You can take his words and make up whatever you want. it's clear to us what Trump was trying to say. bend it however you please
what did I just say. I'll stick with the judges ruling. The immigration judge denied Abrego Garcia's request for bail, stating the claim of gang affiliation "appears to be trustworthy" based on the evidence presented. An immigration appeals board later upheld that decision.
I enjoy your guys narrative of Trumps words and why you would claim this, but its not difficult to understand.
yea I'll stick with the judges actually ruling as stated in the ABC news article rather than your biased opinion lol
It's pretty exhausting explaining, I understand your conclusions and that I dont agree. so last time I'll say it. My position has always been Trump is corrupt and so is Biden and the democrats. Which is why the people just voted on who's more qualified to deliver what they want
how would you determine it was unintentional? you know this how. haha good luck with that. And as long as it mentions possession is against the law it's still illegal. It doesn't specifically say it has to be both. This is why it would need to be ruled on by a judge and it hasn't yet.
according to you. we'll see what happens
yea I'll stick with my facts. You stick with yours. It's a fact Trump was convicted. It's also a fact that that doesnt prevent him from being president. fact is cost of living was lower for me under Trump. fact possibly it wasn't for you. We dont agree. keep that hatred alive though.
yea sure that is why you are making this claim. I dont hear your outrage for the lies that people were killed by January 6. or the outrage of the BLM summer riots.
it doesnt say that intent is also a requirement. It says and not must also have intent. Besides what was his intent if not to retain the documents? nice try, youre reaching pal.
go on good for you keep defending this wife beating, illegal immigrant, gang member. Two heads of state, dea agents, judges. But keep digging that hole pal abc3340.com/news/nation-...
possession on its own is a crime as the law there says. You can dodge all you want. Possession by itself it says is a crime.
haha i love not having 10 million additional illegal immigrants and a lawless dangerous border, i love affordable cost of living with rising wages. you can keep squabbling over all this drama all you want. We just dont agree
so ad hominem attacks. I guess the judge who ruled based off the evidence is corrupt too huh. Sorry pal I dont buy that. Funniest shit ever you morons defending an illegal immigrant, wife beating, gang member
this is why we disagree. You see it one way we and the majority of the country who voted for him see it another way.
immigration judge ruled it in 2019. www.justice.gov/ag/media/139...
abcnews.go.com/US/kilmar-ab....
abcnews.go.com/US/kilmar-ab....
sorry pal he is read it and weep the judges ruling based off of the DEA interviews in 2019 www.justice.gov/ag/media/139...
Aside from a few lines of an opinion from a Democrat lawyer, nowhere in either of those articles does it even mention anything being illegal about it. Let alone prove that could be. Keep Trying liar
correction No REP has ever removed a presidential candidate from the ballot, arrested POTUS, attempted to jail opponents. you can hold strong that it was a threat to national security that you had to prosecute him. but it is simply an attempt to slander him with a trumped up charge during election
every election there are legal protests at the certification by multiple congressmen trying to overturn the results LEGALLY. Just as Trump did. If you like Trump J6 was embarrassing but a riot and nothing more. If you hate Trump then you believe it was coup to violently overthrow the government.
however you wish to interpret it it is clear the added labels are photoshopped and what the tattoos mean. Yet another reason you're so corrupt. you are literally defending a gang member
uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?r...
your proof of this is where? you have shown no proof of any of these claims
ah I've heard of this guy. I think they were saying he wasn't very credible. www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr...
I would love to see where it says that law enforcement said that. Where is that? show me
k show me the article where he says that. Then if he is in possession of documents that in itself is a crime. As he was not president when he obtained them.
what's the problem with hi setting trade policies? as long as he divests from his businesses he's not selling anything to anyone. If there is a case to be made that its illegal, they'll bring it. I have seen nothing saying that what he is doing is illegal. I get it. You dont like it. Not illegal
who cares. Read for yourself
They're not based on your facts. Theyre based on my facts just fine
democrats blame GOP and vice versa for January 6. GOP say Pelosi and Bowser should've allowed for National guard troops. Dems say Trump incited that riot. GOP says the Afghanistan withdrawal was a Biden screw up. Dems say Trumps treaty with the Taliban was the problem. on and on and on
I can have an opinion on the cases while also admitting both Trump and Democrats are corrupt. Nothing moving the goalposts about it. no one is talking about January 6. It didnt work means a corrupt conviction not working to convince voters not to vote for Trump
it was in my original post. I've never said it wasn't. This is the same as the republicans going after Biden for money payments to the big guy. You believe that no matter what proof they have that it's a bogus charge. Whether he's convicted or not the voters determine if it's right or wrong.
how so? innocent until proven guilty applies directly to your statement. It's not a crime officially until proven in a court of law. It's well mentioned that they were trying to election interfere. so Its not moving any goal post. Sounds like you just can't defend your argument
no shit moron it says that in the article title. Jesus Christ idiot. you just jump before you look dont you. It doesnt mean it's some nefarious crime. Im sure you and his enemies want to think it's a big deal, but 77 million Americans say youre full of shit AKA corrupt.
innocent until proven guilty. they convicted him at any cost. They dont care that it probably will be overturned on appeal. They just wanted to be able to call him convicted felon for the election. and the public didn't care because they saw it for what it was. corruption. so they re elected him.
DOJ, state AG, any private group bringing a lawsuit.
Tax evasion and lying to congress. read for yourself. This fairytale you've concocted that somehow Trump committed some heinous crime is a joke. www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr...
and democrats always blame the GOP for their actions. Both sides do the same thing. Both sides are corrupt. You guys fall for this team politics crap so easily. When are you going to learn
Yup just like the many other deals he has. They are just beginning. The article didnt say it was cancelled. So it's still on. Thank you for admitting im right
👍sure pal
yup exactly. It's a bit of a stretch that hush money payments prevented another person from being elected. another problem that people like Alan Dershowitz and Megan Kelly point to is the prevented election is federal not state. So the NY state has no standing. all will be settled don t you worry.
hahahaha and you know this how? you're an expert in election law. well we'll soon find out on the appeal. www.politico.com/live-updates...
yea didn't work though did it.
according to you. See this is why a court is necessary. You say he is accepting bribes. I say what he is doing is unethical maybe, but not illegal. IF it is illegal they would prosecute. But they haven't.
Yea sorry it's only your speculation about what's in the documents and that he was actually not allowed to have them under the law. Still not proven. sorry keep dreaming. Big deal to you not to us. Biden having documents not a big deal either but it is now since you want to go after Trump for it.
Really there is a court case where they ruled on this? No matter how many times you or the media claims things, unless its proven in court, it's meaningless.
so I guess that makes me still right that he secured the investment that they say he didn't. and you a liar
No it's clear to us. They added photoshopped labels to the picture to label each symbols meaning. The press and you have been trying to say they photoshopped the photo trying to imply that they photoshopped the actual tattoos themselves to say MS13. They hope the public will be confused.
I admire your tenacity to never admit anything. Unless your article says the deal is not going through anymore, he still gets credit for the investment because it's still on.
inadvertent retention. Thats hilarious. where's your link to the law or court judgment proving your claim
verifiable facts to you, not to me. It's called a difference in opinion. you say Trump is guilty of something involving meme coin. I say his family manages the company and its profits while he's president. Same as diplomats staying in his hotels if they want a meeting. Un ethical yes, illegal NO
according to you. I would say that Trump did fine with the time had and was just as capable of all the things Biden did had he been re elected. you disagree and thats fine. we disagree. I dont care about your facts. My facts dont agree with yours
It's called a narrative. you have some facts that you piece together to form an opinion. One that I dont agree with. I dont agree with your conclusions no matter how many facts you have. I have my own facts that support my conclusion. we just disagree. and so does the majority of the country
well we disagree then
I you say so. I disagree
sure bud👍
right I just checked Trump was referring to the cost over 2 decades being $85 billion. Looks like it was only $7 billion lol. pocket change ya know. just pocket change right. I dont know about you but I enjoy watching Taliban flying US Blackhawks in their parades www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/09...
hahaha can't handle the truth huh. Hey I didnt say it Biden said Trump was bad for covid and that Biden would fix it hahahaha
sure pal. we (the majority of the country who voted for Trump) just dont agree. just kick back n relax while Trump takes the next 3 years hopefully arresting all of his enemies for the crimes they've committed. payback's a bitch. It's going to be fun.
this is fast becoming a waste of my time. I get it you think Trump bad cause he's a convicted felon. good for you. Me and most of the country dont agree with you. good luck to you. bye bye
yea cause he was the first president to ever break the law. right. nice try. sorry the only first is the democrats locking up their political opponents. like they do in 3rd world countries
you said he's the only one who killed Americans with his policies and dealing with crisis. Well thats a lie. Bidens dealings got 13 marines killed A$55 billion in lost military hardware and a mass exodus cluster fuck, killing afghan allies.
Congressmen can invest using inside information and receive money from foreigners too, it's not illegal. The crypto profits remain in a trust managed by his family. If they have a case that it is illegal they will bring it. So far nothing. Whine all you want. you can't prove it🖕