yea I'll stick with the judges actually ruling as stated in the ABC news article rather than your biased opinion lol
yea I'll stick with the judges actually ruling as stated in the ABC news article rather than your biased opinion lol
I’ll stick the idea that a thrice married, adjudicated rapist, with 34 felonies, who is prohibited from doing business because he stole money from a kids charity, who filed bankruptcy 6x, and been fined for fraud more than once isn’t a good leader over your garbage opinion as well, lol gtfoh
lol, the judge references the same form, dummy. It even says that in your article.
what did I just say. I'll stick with the judges ruling. The immigration judge denied Abrego Garcia's request for bail, stating the claim of gang affiliation "appears to be trustworthy" based on the evidence presented. An immigration appeals board later upheld that decision.
The form isn’t a “ruling”, the form is evidence used in the ruling. The form was filled out by a cop who pled guilty to a crime undermining his trustworthiness. Many gang experts and gang members contradict the same cops claims. Keep being a hypocrite if you want.
hey as long as there are two judges that found the reports credible enough, thats good enough for me. You guys can tell yourselves whatever you want it won't matter when they deport him.
It does matter though, because that’s what makes you a hypocrite, lol
“sure, pal” Lol