Yes there are always the enlightened few, it’s true. But I’d guess Aristotle’s opinion was by far the mainstream in Greek opinion.
Yes there are always the enlightened few, it’s true. But I’d guess Aristotle’s opinion was by far the mainstream in Greek opinion.
I have my doubts. One piece of evidence is Demosthenes’ “Aristogeiton”.
He had an affair with foreign woman resident in Athens; they fell out; he tried to get her sold into slavery. This is presented to the public as seriously shameful conduct—you can’t just sell a foreign woman into slavery, especially when she had been his benefactor. And if presented as shameful
it’s presumably because the speaker expects his audience to agree. I don’t think it’s safe to say they regarded foreigners as sub-human: in this case, it’s clear that trying to enslave a foreigner who had been a benefactor was the sort of conduct that called for censure.
I think respectable Athenian opinion would probably have been scandalised by the American slaveholder class’s selling its concubines and their children.
Just in general: ancients are interesting and important; and sometimes very seriously intelligent and insightful. It’s a mistake to think (worse, hope) they were all proto-Nazis. The scale and nature of enmity between peoples in the wake of European expansion post-Columbus is quite likely new.