I am so gladdened to see this.

Wow, I was sure they'd just be denied without cause like in the SC FWS case.

I should think so, if that Not All Gays group could intervene.

You mean the "mostly straight alliance"

The ‘almost totally straight alliance.’

We will be in 2027 and judge will still be letting people to intervene in this ridiculously straightforward case.

Haha, true.

I'm beginning to have more confidence in the Peggie tribunal than in the supreme court.

Thank fuck. At least one legal case involving us will have our voice heard. ❤️

We're fucked. TransLucent headed by TrueTrans CrumbMaiden. I don't have any faith in them. Probably why the Judge granted them permission, but not others.

I certainly hope they are going to argue that if sex has a consistent meaning in EA2010, then having undergone gender reassignment, Dr Upton is "biologically" female in accordance with s7. If not, they are negligent.

It looks like they are not going to touch on EA2010 but only the Workplace Regulations as EU law.

And that is a great thing to do, but if you're going to get the chance to intervene, you should be putting the alternative in case that argument fails. Because the reality is, this is a case under EA2010. Its a novel point and if rejected allows appeal.

📌