1/🧵 Now the hate groups published their submissions against NHS Fife. I can say this is perjury and nuttier than what was reported.
Replies
Every so often, I have to remind myself what the tribunal is really about because the reporting is so terrible. The question is, was NHS Fife right to suspend Peggie pending an investigation into alleged bullying, harassment, and patient safety issues? So much has been irrelevant to that.
sep 1, 2025, 11:17 pm • 7 0 • view
Exactly. As counsel has pointed out, Peggie has to date made no formal complaint about anyone using the toilet, which serves as a changing room merely by custom.
sep 1, 2025, 11:23 pm • 10 1 • view
hmtl files lmao
sep 2, 2025, 3:12 am • 2 0 • view
And then the unanswerable question in all these cases impacting trans folks… “how does this individual get held to account in a consequential manner that also strikes their evidence from consideration?” The sad cynic in me wonders if the “pro-trans” sides simply try to throw the cases :(
sep 2, 2025, 4:44 am • 1 0 • view
2/ Google Takeout (or any other method of exporting from Google Keep) does not provide the original stored data. Instead, it generates what we ordinarily call “reports” on the fly. So, the export cannot prove or disprove what was saved to the ☁️. That exercise is completely irrelevant as evidence.
sep 1, 2025, 10:19 pm • 19 1 • view
3/ I previously wrote this: medium.com/@notashley/j... There are far too many way the metadata can lose meaning that the so-called expert cannot account for. He cannot claim to have made any genuine effort to replicate this.
sep 1, 2025, 10:19 pm • 18 2 • view
4/ As a member of the chartered institute for computing (we caution against misuse of expert evidence after the Post Office scandal), I am bound by professional ethics. I can state unequivocally that Jim Borwick is not a member of our profession. And should not be allowed to give evidence.
sep 1, 2025, 10:19 pm • 23 2 • view
Given that he has and it may influence the tribunal, what are potential recourses?
sep 1, 2025, 10:27 pm • 1 0 • view
My instinct is that the panel (one judge and two CIPD members) would simply dismiss or disregard these conspiracy theory-like side issues. If this goes awry, the only recourse would be an appeal.
sep 1, 2025, 10:32 pm • 5 0 • view
Thanks! I expect there will be an appeal whatever the outcome.
sep 1, 2025, 10:34 pm • 1 0 • view
Recent history suggests institutions do not appeal in matters of trans rights
sep 1, 2025, 10:37 pm • 5 0 • view
True. I suppose it depends what the tribunal actually finds. If it just finds that there was a procedural error, may be less likely to appeal. If it rules about sexual harassment or the like, an appeal seems more probable.
sep 2, 2025, 6:22 am • 1 0 • view
5/ I do not practice law in the UK, so in this case I can only comment on matters strictly within my own profession. Whether barristers and hate groups conspired to interfere with the administration of justice is not my concern and remains a question for further investigation.
sep 1, 2025, 10:28 pm • 20 3 • view
I seem to recall in one case I was involved in the Judge asked for someone from the Register of Experts. Would/should one of those have not been called here?
sep 1, 2025, 11:04 pm • 4 0 • view