Lol. Despite all the sources I've posted, you still believe that Kyle wasn't legally armed. Why would I get into a political debate with you? You're not interested in an honest discussion. That much is obvious.
Replies
No he was legally armed according to the law. He should not have been armed. The case law was written for hunting, not for riots. Sure its poorly worded, but it is a loophole and you damn well know it. Since you are so hard core on interpretation of the law, whats your thoughts on the 2nd amend?
aug 24, 2025, 7:42 pm • 0 0 • view
Except, that "loophole" was reviewed & there was an effort to modify it. That measure failed & today the law remains as originally written. Under these circumstances, we can't refer to this as a "loophole" anymore.
aug 24, 2025, 9:34 pm • 0 0 • view