Yea but he’s also right. If he were to leave the nytimes and, say, they replaced him with a Maureen Dowd-type, readership would likely stay the same, but they would no longer be challenged on issues that I think are vital.

He could start a substack, maybe feel less conflicted, but reach a fraction of the audience preaching to the already converted.

Substack has issues as well. (IIRC Nazi's. money talks, capitalism, etc.)

Oh, I'm not saying he should quit. I mean, he should but then he doesn't have the voice he has. I'm just saying that the NYT isn't worthy of his work and/or reputation. But capitalism makes many of us compromise. 🤷🏾‍♂️

Yea. *sadness*