There's a resident of Seattle (with 2 sign-on plaintiffs) over it's use of IZ (we call it MHA here). Their take is that it's unconstitutional and the fees are arbitrary. Hopeful that this finds in favor of plaintiffs and deems IZ illegal.
There's a resident of Seattle (with 2 sign-on plaintiffs) over it's use of IZ (we call it MHA here). Their take is that it's unconstitutional and the fees are arbitrary. Hopeful that this finds in favor of plaintiffs and deems IZ illegal.
There's a pretty straightforward 5th Amendment argument that it is an illegal taking.