I believe you are a MAGAt troll. I also believe you're pretty ignorant if you think that any single action or policy will prevent any individual disaster. No one here gets paid to teach you to think better or know more about climate science, so it's sad you're too lazy to look into it on your own.

I thought the whole point of social media was expressing your opinion. But you make it sound like asking for the opinions of others is forbidden territory here.

Here's some more data to help you "do your own research", which MAGAts claim to LOVE doing ... bsky.app/profile/dave...

Both the articles in the links you replied with are very informative, but neither proposes any kind of comprehensive plan for addressing climate change issues. They point out the problem but don't propose any solutions. My question was about possible solutions, not data confirmation.

You're HILARIOUS! Have you been living under a rock somewhere? There have been scientific recommendations issued in multiple forums, on multiple platforms, by multiple expert bodies FOR DECADES! Have you read none of them, or just ignored or dismissed them? Do you know how the Google works?

Here's some facts for you, specific to the issue of the wildfires. Enjoy. bsky.app/profile/geor...

First, you didn't "express your opinion", you asked a question to challenge someone else's expression of THEIR opinion. Again, why are you asking 'opinions' of random people on an issue of SCIENTIFIC FACT, as if opinions overrule facts. They don't, except in MAGAt brains.

You’re a dissembling crunt though

Just for clarity, to whom were you directing that remark?

The person. Was replying to, not you

Thanks for clearing that up for me, lol.

Hey look it’s the just asking questions guy

What action will prevent this single disaster? That's now how this works. We need a coordinated effort to drastically reduce greenhouse gases over the long term, which cause severe droughts and extreme weather events that lead to situations like these.

Okay but how do you marshal that coordinated effort? How do you overcome the votes of the people who disagree with climate change? In a democratic society, we can't just ignore those that disagree with our vision for addressing climate change, because their votes matter just as much as ours do.

You're saying, "But isn't action haard??" Yeah. We're behind the game already; do you want to delay more? Don't go pretending climate change is just something one can disagree with, like it's an opinion about a movie. Yeah, we can ignore ignorant people when action needs to be taken.

That’s like dithering on getting cancer treatment because you already dithered for a month.

I am not going to engage in sealioning all day, I already answered your question.

There's only one. Reduce carbon emissions.