Wasn’t his daughter the mother of the Von Trapp children ie Sound of Music?
Wasn’t his daughter the mother of the Von Trapp children ie Sound of Music?
31. On the internet Ballistic missile submarines are often referred to as ‘Boomers’. But that’s the USN lingo, the British equivalent is ‘Bomber’
32. Another British-American submarine terminology difference is the bit that sticks up in the middle. American term is ‘sail’, but Brits call it the ‘fin’
33. Should point out, Americans say ‘submariner’ wrong (I’m a Brit so I would say that)
34. The French term for the sail/fin is ‘kiosk’, although some would argue that’s old fashioned (like conning tower)
How long ago are we talking for Old Fashioned? I was a midshipman starting in '06 (unable to commission for medical) and definitely learned it as conning tower from the LT.
Which navy? I’m not fussed, but conning tower was when there was an chamber in it for the conn
U.S. College program midshipman at U of SC.
And that LT served on boomers.
Interesting Was ‘sail’ also used on your submarine?
Not that I recall.
In 1950s when USN & RN started streamlining it they switched terminology to sail/fin, partly to emphasize the change I think
Curious, in spanish, the word "kiosco" or "quiosco" is used when refering to newsstand/paper shop business
Kiosque in french is a little structure. You can find them in public gardens where some musicians can play for instance. It is also a little structure where people sell stuff (newspaper, flower, whatever). And the submarine's top structures. (But I'm not sure while it would sound old fashion 😅)
Here in spain "kiosko" means the same for 2 of the 3 cases, for the submarine top structure, is called the "vela" (sail) of the submarine.
The Spanish choice might simply be because after WW2 they got subs from America before later adopting French subs
In Swedish it is, as far as I understand, "torn" i.e. tower or turret.
35. Anyone who wants to seriously argue, or worse belittle others, based on the use of these terms is a plank and best avoided
Isn't it tragic how no WW1 submarines survive? Those boats had real conning towers. I mean, U-1, but that was a training boat only, already obsolete in 1914. Kerosene-powered attack submarine...
Yes See post .38
36. LNG tankers are probably a lot harder to blow up than most people imagine (Admittedly I’ve never tried)
I'd guess the second torpedo hit would do the job. The first opens a tank and aerates the gas, the second ignites it. If this is a scenario, there is probably also a time component, as you need sufficient time for the gas to deliquefy.
Then again, liquid gas is heavier than air, so normal ship destruction processes apply. Open a hole big enough underwater in the hull and normal fluid dynamics start doing their thing. (This is an interesting question. I'm at least one navy has researched it.)
😂😂😂 www.youtube.com/shorts/HBB3D...
38. The German UC-1 and follow-on UC-2 classes were the most successful submarines ever, but they are largely forgotten. They sunk ships by laying mines.
Mines are just underrated in general. There's a reason we Aussies keep a decent stockpile of Stonefish around.
The Germans didn't really go for (the smaller) sub minelayers in WW2. Any idea why? Maritime patrol aircraft? Payload considered too small? Focus on convoys?
39. The Soviet Ushakov flying submarine was a terrible idea. Only famous for fanboy reasons
Now that is something I would have drawn as a kid.
40. The VA-111 Shkval rocket powered supercavitating torpedo is much overrated. It’s interesting but nowhere near the superweapon the internet makes out
oops
Just 114 more facts (and counting) and you'll meet the challenge. I predict you won't make it 😜
As an American, the Americans win this one.
As an American, not navy, the Brits are right.