Just another Trump dick sucker who has no fucking idea what he is talking about. What dumpster fire are these MFPOS coming from.Gezzzz.

What's difficult for reporters is there's no evidence showing Mob's actual reasons for the visit. You can speculate (they want money) but the only reported justification is the concern for the fire safety of the building.

Our literacy crisis is more profound than even I imagined. Even the reporters are illiterate!

One absolute truism they prove everyday is our political class are the laziest humans alive. They would go extinct if they were a species in the wild

During the 2016 campaign, Trump tweeted a Star of David as a way of calling Clinton a Jew and then he said it was a sheriff star and the press was like "oh, no further questions." And they've done that for every one of his lies since.

I mean all we have to report on is that Kyle Rittenhouse went to Kenosha to defend property in a city and state he doesn't live in from "unrest" all I can do is studiously parrot this in my article the reality is truly unknowable.

A lot of journalism folk not beating the allegation that they don't actually understand what their job is. Carl: "We need to dig into this, get to the bottom of what is going on..." Bob: "You fool, we simply need to wait for Nixon to send us a press release. Let's get drinks."

He’s targeting minority-majority blue cities and lying about crime rates in the process. A journalist can just plainly state those facts! They don’t need to be provided a specific, singular reason!

Do they think it’s possible that a guy who lies all the time might be lying this time? Maybe?

Idk guys maybe we should take this Hitler guy at face value. After all, its not like we can know anything about his intentions. (Yes i know im breaking godwins law. I dont care)

"Well they didn't spoon feed us any alternative explanations so I guess we'll run with what they said" are you stupid? Is that it? All of you are stupid??

yes, yes, yes

^^^^

Look the truth is ultimately unknowable, unless a guy tells you, then you've reported on it (science like!). But if another guy tells you the opposite, then it becomes unknowable again. You have to add ", others disagree" to your headline to show that questions were raised, the situation confused

journalism school seems to turn you into a mark

Nope, it’s the opposite direction—but those who work for corporates must quickly adopt bothsidesism or leave.

Ok but he writes for City and State

You’re correct. Only knew him via Politico and New York Observer. Double clicked and rather than any Journalism program, he studied Cultural Anthropology (BA from Columbia). Hope J programs (non-broadcast ones) still turning curious keen observers into truth-distilling investigative storytellers.

Yes. Yes they are. They’ve coasted far too long as glorified stenographers.

Mute or block that account — his takes across topics are so often this shallow or worse.