avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

More women who'd really like to have kids but haven't found someone they want to partner with might have kids alone if they got $20-40k a year to help them manage it.

sep 2, 2025, 4:00 pm • 106 6

Replies

avatar
Tony Weiss @mrweiss.bsky.social

Agreed, cost is a huge limiting factor in family size (or even existence). Maybe especially so for folks who need to go through surrogacy, artificial insemination, even adoption to have the families that they want — those are all very expensive! Includes potential solo moms, but also many others.

sep 2, 2025, 5:02 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Christo Silvia @christosilvia.bsky.social

We used to have this in the US and it got labeled a "Welfare Queen"

sep 2, 2025, 4:07 pm • 7 0 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

Right there are reasons we don't do this. It's just like, if these people actually cared about the birthrate qua birthrate, there's lots of untapped policy levers.

sep 2, 2025, 4:09 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Christo Silvia @christosilvia.bsky.social

There are both good reasons and bad reasons we don't do this!

sep 2, 2025, 4:12 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Christo Silvia @christosilvia.bsky.social

Honestly you'd probably need $40-60k/yr. Then you get into minefields about means testing.

sep 2, 2025, 4:07 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

Depends on where in the country I think.

sep 2, 2025, 4:09 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Christo Silvia @christosilvia.bsky.social

You'll end up with a nightmare policy like social security

sep 2, 2025, 4:12 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
cuttingcorners.bsky.social @cuttingcorners.bsky.social

Baseline pay for a surrogate is 60k if we’re talking the monetary value women put on just bringing a kid into the world.

sep 2, 2025, 5:25 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
ryan cooper @ryanlcooper.com

I think quantities matter a lot. child allowances are great but nowhere, not even the Nordics, is anywhere close to actually compensating for what the kid costs in money and opportunities

sep 2, 2025, 4:02 pm • 40 2 • view
avatar
simpsong @yakuzajohn.bsky.social

I don’t know how this would be translated into policy but it is so hard to find time to be someone other than a parent the more kids you have. extended + weekend hour daycare centers?? something to recreate a Village for people without nearby family or money for babysitters

sep 2, 2025, 4:05 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

Precisely, yeah. People talk about how these policies are failing to move the needle even when they're generous and like....listen man I spend more than four grand a month on childcare *alone*.

sep 2, 2025, 4:03 pm • 39 2 • view
avatar
ItsEasyBeingGreen @itseasybeinggreen.bsky.social

In Norway that's state capped at like $200 per kid or something in that ballpark tho.

sep 2, 2025, 4:28 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
ryan cooper @ryanlcooper.com

you'd think the neoliberal crowd would be on this. rational profit maximizers can compare quantities of money pretty easily!

sep 2, 2025, 4:07 pm • 22 2 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

You'd think! But they're homo economis believers until it touches their psychosexual hangups and then boy howdy we're in the Feelings Zone.

sep 2, 2025, 4:08 pm • 24 2 • view
avatar
ryan cooper @ryanlcooper.com

anyway excuse to post I think the best bit Michael Moore ever did www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UwQ...

sep 2, 2025, 4:11 pm • 12 0 • view
avatar
Domenic Noto @dnoto7.bsky.social

It sucks that the birth rate weirdos have made the discourse like this. We should subsidize it regardless of whether it increases birth rates or not because it’s the right thing to do

sep 2, 2025, 5:28 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

That's right

sep 2, 2025, 5:29 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
big butthead @c10h12n2o.net

There’s a solid amount of opportunity cost to kids as well, having nothing to do with finances. People not having children until they’re 35 because being child-free in your 20s kicks ass means that at best, you’re having two kids. You could have given me $50,000 extra per year - wouldn’t take it.

sep 2, 2025, 4:05 pm • 10 0 • view
avatar
vacchagotta @vacchagotta.bsky.social

Well that's just ridiculously unrealistic

sep 2, 2025, 4:37 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
shadow-ag.bsky.social @shadow-ag.bsky.social

That’s spending <720k over the childhood of a kid. Does that kid grow up to produce more than 720k? Most stats I’ve seen say yes

sep 2, 2025, 5:50 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

Possibly, but the alternatives to pretty out-there policies like this appear to be either 1) not doing anything about well below replacement fertility or 2) subjugating women, and #2 should obviously be beyond the pale.

sep 2, 2025, 5:21 pm • 49 1 • view
avatar
alex @chudmeridian.bsky.social

1 seems like the reasonable course to me although basically no one wants to say that. Some negative effects of people not wanting kids but not enough to warrant the actual cost to fix

sep 2, 2025, 5:25 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

Pretty much, yeah. I think it's bad that desired fertility so consistently falls below actual fertility, but if we don't want to do what's necessary to address that problem, well, I guess we don't.

sep 2, 2025, 5:26 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
alex @chudmeridian.bsky.social

I’ve always been a little skeptical of that stat tbh. If you asked me that question 5 years ago, I might have said 4. If you asked me today, I’d say 3. After my second is born and I’m in the thick of it, decent odds I might say 2.

sep 2, 2025, 5:40 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
alex @chudmeridian.bsky.social

The survey also smooths over the bargaining problem. Woman wants 2 kids, husband wants 3. They eventually agree to 2. You put them both in a survey and you get desired 2.5, actual 2. Is it a societal problem the woman “won?” Idk. Just a dumb example but I suspect it might be more complicated.

sep 2, 2025, 5:47 pm • 7 0 • view
avatar
JB stan account @johnbrownstan.bsky.social

Hard for me to imagine a scenario where desired fertility from surveys <= actual fertility without extreme poverty, rules against birth control, or one side of a relationship consistently being a subject of the other

sep 2, 2025, 5:53 pm • 7 0 • view
avatar
alex @chudmeridian.bsky.social

Happened during the immediate postwar baby boom if you look at the Gallup time series but since I think 1960 it’s been desired < actual

sep 2, 2025, 5:56 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
alex @chudmeridian.bsky.social

Sorry I screwed up the inequality lol but you know what I mean

sep 2, 2025, 5:57 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
JB stan account @johnbrownstan.bsky.social

(Usually all three)

sep 2, 2025, 5:55 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
vacchagotta @vacchagotta.bsky.social

I just don't think sub-replacement fertility is going to be a problem. It's going to dovetail nicely with the fact that AI is going to destroy white collar employment and everyone can just work as okd-age carers instead

sep 2, 2025, 5:39 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
vacchagotta @vacchagotta.bsky.social

Like in 500 BCE there were only 100 million people and the world produced the Buddha, Mahavira, Lao-tzu, Confucius, Zoroaster, Heraclitus, etc. We don't need that many people.

sep 2, 2025, 5:43 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Wandering Hoo @wanderlib.bsky.social

I'm also not sure 2 would work.

sep 2, 2025, 5:22 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

I'm basically OK with #1, although I think parents and children deserve support anyway because they're much more likely to be poor than childless families.

sep 2, 2025, 5:25 pm • 35 0 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

Also this. Parenting needs to be broadly easier, less of the burden needs to fall on women, and men need to do more.

sep 2, 2025, 7:35 pm • 30 0 • view
avatar
Andrew @adhoffma.bsky.social

I thought there was some study that men have drastically increased their time-spent-parenting (to the point where modern men parent more than their grandmothers), but in a blow for equality women have ALSO drastically increased their time-spent-parenting.

sep 2, 2025, 7:42 pm • 2 1 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

I am open to coercive culture shifting on this. Mandatory paternity leave, for example. Not use-it-or-lose-it, but mandatory leave that you get penalized for not taking unless you have certain extenuating circumstances.

sep 2, 2025, 7:37 pm • 33 0 • view
avatar
alex block @alexblock.bsky.social

Even beyond parental leave; ending the work day on time to enable kid pickup from school/daycare/aftercare, and normalizing this with work culture.

sep 2, 2025, 7:57 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

Men simply need to take six months to take care of their fucking children!

sep 2, 2025, 7:38 pm • 40 1 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

As a dad, I am extremely unhappy with other dads who don't at least try to pull their weight. What the fuck are you doing.

sep 2, 2025, 7:40 pm • 39 0 • view
avatar
Ollie the Cat @skulker13.bsky.social

Same. I judge people, especially dads, as how good of parents they are.

sep 2, 2025, 7:58 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Don Rafa @raf.bsky.social

don’t get me started on dads who say they’re “babysitting”.

sep 2, 2025, 8:15 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
Ollie the Cat @skulker13.bsky.social

I think my wife would cut me for saying something like that.

sep 2, 2025, 8:19 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Buttadeus @thewanderingjew.bsky.social

It does feel like a big problem is that human reproduction involves a 8-10 lb being ripping its way out of your genitals.

sep 2, 2025, 7:36 pm • 4 1 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

Manhattan Project for artificial wombs/making pregnancy and childbirth safer and easier.

sep 2, 2025, 7:37 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
schnufflerowner.bsky.social @schnufflerowner.bsky.social

Honestly, I think free, convenient daycare would do it.

sep 3, 2025, 1:32 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Send Cuomo to Florida @notandrewcuomo.bsky.social

There are dozens of social welfare policies that would make having kids easier/more appealing. Another element is reshaping the workplace so that having a kid isn't a complete career killer. There's been a lot of reporting on how return to office drove working mother's to leave the workforce.

sep 2, 2025, 6:08 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Leonid Baezhnev @rev-avocado.bsky.social

As a working father who wants to be home for bedtime every night if possible, I feel this intensely!

sep 2, 2025, 6:10 pm • 3 0 • view