No idea, but I think it's good that they recognised it wasnt good and are trying again. We'll have to see. It does look like it's with Nandy and I agree she's been useless so far.
No idea, but I think it's good that they recognised it wasnt good and are trying again. We'll have to see. It does look like it's with Nandy and I agree she's been useless so far.
They need to get her back to the back benches. She’s like seaweed just floating about all day doing nothing recognisably useful
Hers is probably seen as a minor position but there's a lot of potential influence there. For example reforming media standards and enforcement of those standards.
I agree there’s a lot could be done. The trouble is, she’s either not doing any of it or not seen to be doing any of it. If you search news items for her you come up blank. You’d expect something worthy of note after a year in post but there’s just nothing.